New MCP server — Bring vulnerability intelligence into your AI
Back to feed

CVE-2022-31105

NVDCIRCLENISA

EUVD-2022-6279 · Published Jul 12, 2022

Argo CD certificate verification is skipped for connections to OIDC providers

Impact

All versions of Argo CD starting with v0.4.0 are vulnerable to an improper certificate validation bug which could cause Argo CD to trust a malicious (or otherwise untrustworthy) OIDC provider.

(Note: external OIDC provider support was added in v0.11.0. Before that version, the notes below apply only to the bundled Dex instance.)

You are impacted if 1) have SSO enabled and 2) insecure mode is not enabled on the API server. In this case, certificate verification is skipped when connecting to your OIDC provider for the following tasks: verifying auth tokens on API requests and handling SSO login flows. If you are using the bundled Dex instance but have not set the --dex-server flag on the API server to an HTTPS address, then certificate verification is not being skipped (because TLS is not enabled by default for the bundled Dex instance).

Argo CD sends requests to the configured OIDC provider (either the bundled Dex instance or an external provider) to 1) retrieve the OpenID configuration, 2) to retrieve the OIDC provider's key set (at the location determined by the OIDC provider's configured jwks_uri), and 3) (during an SSO login) to exchange an authorization code for a token.

(Note: Starting with v2.3.0, certificate verification is not skipped when handling an SSO login flow if 1) you are not using the bundled Dex OIDC provider and 2) you have set oidc.config.rootCA in the argocd-cm ConfigMap. Certificate verification is still skipped when verifying tokens on API calls.)

Skipping certificate verification when communicating with the OIDC provider opens Argo CD to a variety of risks. For example, if an attacker can successfully intercept, decrypt, and respond to requests bound for the configured OIDC provider (a machine-in-the-middle attack), they could theoretically issue a "valid" admin token. Verifying the OIDC provider's certificate provides an extra layer of protection against such an attack.

Patches

A patch for this vulnerability has been released in the following Argo CD versions:

  • v2.4.5
  • v2.3.6
  • v2.2.11

Note:

To preserve backwards compatibility, this patch adds a oidc.tls.insecure.skip.verify option to the argocd-cm ConfigMap. The default is "false". Before resorting to setting this, you should try to get certificate verification to work. If you are using the bundled Dex instance, user your Argo CD API server's TLS configuration since the API server acts as a reverse proxy to Dex. If you are using an external OIDC provider, set the rootCA config.

If these fail, be sure you are aware of the risks before setting oidc.tls.insecure.skip.verify: "true".

Workarounds

There is no complete workaround besides upgrading.

Partial mitigation when using an external OIDC provider

If you are using an external OIDC provider (not the bundled Dex instance), then you can mitigate the issue by setting the oidc.config.rootCA field in the argocd-cm ConfigMap. If your OIDC provider's certificate is self-signed or otherwise invalid, you must set the rootCA to a certificate that enables verification. If the OIDC provider's certificate passes without an additional root CA, then you can set oidc.config.rootCA to a bogus non-empty string such as "force cert verification". The API server will log a warning, but otherwise things should work fine.

Example:

metadata:
  name: argocd-cm
data:
  oidc.config: |
    ...
    rootCA: |
      force cert verification

This mitigation only forces certificate validation when the API server handles login flows. It does not force certificate verification when verifying tokens on API calls. To fully resolve the vulnerability, you must upgrade.

References
Credits

@jannfis and @crenshaw-dev discovered the vulnerability when reviewing notes from ADA Logics' security audit of the Argo project sponsored by CNCF and facilitated by OSTIF. Thanks to Adam Korczynski and David Korczynski for their work on the audit.

For more information

Technologies

Argoproj Argo CdLinuxfoundation Argo-CdArgoproj Argo-Cd

Weaknesses

CWE-295CWE-599

CVSS scores

  • v3.18.3CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

MITRE ATT&CK

Inferred

Where this vulnerability fits in an attack

Initial Access

References

Potentially impacted assets

See if this affects your attack surface

Latest trending attack

Criticalyesterday

Google Brotli decoder - Remote Code Execution via compressed requests (Exploitation Check)

This control is the second step of the Patrowl response to CVE-2026-111497 (Node2Shell). It complements the first control of 22 October 2026, which focused on the Node.js runtime, and does not replace it. Why a second control CVE-2026-111497 is an out-of-bounds write in the Google Brotli decoder, the library that decompresses Brotli ("br") data. It was first published as a Node.js vulnerability, because Node.js bundles this decoder. Later publications showed that the flaw is in the library itself. Every product that embeds an affected version of the decoder is concerned, whatever its language or vendor. A public proof of concept demonstrates code execution. Any server that decompresses request bodies sent with "Content-Encoding: br" exposes the decoder to unauthenticated attackers. Known cases include Express 5 and NestJS 11 on Node.js, Koa and Fastify setups, Bun, Envoy and Istio with request decompression enabled, and any application or reverse proxy that decodes Brotli request bodies with an affected library. The flaw also works in the other direction. A malicious server can compromise an unpatched client that decodes a Brotli response, for example Node.js fetch(), Python clients (requests, httpx, aiohttp, Scrapy) with the Brotli or brotlicffi package, or libcurl builds with Brotli support. What this control checks Patrowl sends small, valid Brotli-compressed requests to each asset and observes whether the server decodes them. The check does not depend on the technology: it detects the behaviour, whatever the stack behind it. These requests are what any legitimate client could send. They never reach the vulnerable code path and cannot affect the availability of the service. How to read the result Potentially impacted means the asset decodes Brotli request bodies: the attack surface is exposed. It does not confirm that the asset is vulnerable. The version of the Brotli decoder in use is not visible from the outside. This check covers applications that parse request bodies on their root path. A Not impacted result does not rule out exposure on other routes, nor on the client side. Checking the versions on the servers remains the only exhaustive verification. Affected and fixed versions Google Brotli 1.0.3 to 1.2.0 are affected, fixed in 1.0.10, 1.1.1 and 1.2.1. Fixed releases of the main products embedding it: Node.js 22.23.4, 24.22.1 and 26.12.1 (end-of-life lines 20.x and older and 25.x receive no fix), Bun 1.4.4, Envoy 1.37.8, 1.38.6, 1.39.3 and 1.40.0, Istio 1.29.9, 1.30.6 and 1.31.2, Python Brotli 1.2.1 and brotlicffi 1.2.1.0. Products that link against the system library depend on the Brotli package of the Linux distribution. Recommendations Update every component that embeds the Brotli decoder (only real fix). Start with the assets flagged by this control. Restart the processes after the update. Rebuild containers, single-executable applications and appliances that bundle an affected runtime or library. Reduce the exposure until the update is deployed. Reject requests with "Content-Encoding: br" at the reverse proxy, load balancer or WAF, case-insensitively and including lists such as "gzip, br". On Envoy and Istio, disable request decompression for Brotli. Review outbound calls. List the features that fetch content from servers you do not control, and patch the services that host them first.

Take 15 minutes to discover our platform with our experts

Patrowl Intel platform screenshot