[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"landing-trending":3,"cve-CVE-2022-50011":30,"landing-articles":74},{"count":4,"next":5,"previous":6,"results":7},266,"http:\u002F\u002Fweb:8606\u002Fapi\u002Ftrending_attacks\u002F?page=2&page_size=3&sorted_by=-published_at",null,[8,17,20],{"id":9,"title":10,"summary":11,"published_at":12,"severity":13,"vendor":14,"products":15},265,"Google Brotli decoder - Remote Code Execution via compressed requests (Exploitation Check)","This control is the second step of the Patrowl response to CVE-2026-111497 (Node2Shell). It complements the first control of 22 October 2026, which focused on the Node.js runtime, and does not replace it.\r\n\r\nWhy a second control\r\n\r\nCVE-2026-111497 is an out-of-bounds write in the Google Brotli decoder, the library that decompresses Brotli (\"br\") data. It was first published as a Node.js vulnerability, because Node.js bundles this decoder. Later publications showed that the flaw is in the library itself. Every product that embeds an affected version of the decoder is concerned, whatever its language or vendor. A public proof of concept demonstrates code execution.\r\n\r\nAny server that decompresses request bodies sent with \"Content-Encoding: br\" exposes the decoder to unauthenticated attackers. Known cases include Express 5 and NestJS 11 on Node.js, Koa and Fastify setups, Bun, Envoy and Istio with request decompression enabled, and any application or reverse proxy that decodes Brotli request bodies with an affected library.\r\n\r\nThe flaw also works in the other direction. A malicious server can compromise an unpatched client that decodes a Brotli response, for example Node.js fetch(), Python clients (requests, httpx, aiohttp, Scrapy) with the Brotli or brotlicffi package, or libcurl builds with Brotli support.\r\n\r\nWhat this control checks\r\n\r\nPatrowl sends small, valid Brotli-compressed requests to each asset and observes whether the server decodes them. The check does not depend on the technology: it detects the behaviour, whatever the stack behind it. These requests are what any legitimate client could send. They never reach the vulnerable code path and cannot affect the availability of the service.\r\n\r\nHow to read the result\r\n\r\nPotentially impacted means the asset decodes Brotli request bodies: the attack surface is exposed. It does not confirm that the asset is vulnerable. The version of the Brotli decoder in use is not visible from the outside.\r\n\r\nThis check covers applications that parse request bodies on their root path. A Not impacted result does not rule out exposure on other routes, nor on the client side. Checking the versions on the servers remains the only exhaustive verification.\r\n\r\nAffected and fixed versions\r\n\r\nGoogle Brotli 1.0.3 to 1.2.0 are affected, fixed in 1.0.10, 1.1.1 and 1.2.1. Fixed releases of the main products embedding it: Node.js 22.23.4, 24.22.1 and 26.12.1 (end-of-life lines 20.x and older and 25.x receive no fix), Bun 1.4.4, Envoy 1.37.8, 1.38.6, 1.39.3 and 1.40.0, Istio 1.29.9, 1.30.6 and 1.31.2, Python Brotli 1.2.1 and brotlicffi 1.2.1.0. Products that link against the system library depend on the Brotli package of the Linux distribution.\r\n\r\nRecommendations\r\n\r\nUpdate every component that embeds the Brotli decoder (only real fix). Start with the assets flagged by this control. Restart the processes after the update. Rebuild containers, single-executable applications and appliances that bundle an affected runtime or library.\r\n\r\nReduce the exposure until the update is deployed. Reject requests with \"Content-Encoding: br\" at the reverse proxy, load balancer or WAF, case-insensitively and including lists such as \"gzip, br\". On Envoy and Istio, disable request decompression for Brotli.\r\n\r\nReview outbound calls. List the features that fetch content from servers you do not control, and patch the services that host them first.","2026-10-24T10:37:22.192753Z",4,"google",[16],"brotli",{"id":4,"title":10,"summary":18,"published_at":12,"severity":13,"vendor":14,"products":19},"This control is the second step of the Patrowl response to CVE-2026-111497 (Node2Shell). It complements the first control of 22 October 2026, which focused on the Node.js runtime, and does not replace it.\r\n\r\nWhy a second control\r\n\r\nCVE-2026-111497 is an out-of-bounds write in the Google Brotli decoder, the library that decompresses Brotli (\"br\") data. It was first published as a Node.js vulnerability, because Node.js bundles this decoder. Later publications showed that the flaw is in the library itself. Every product that embeds an affected version of the decoder is concerned, whatever its language or vendor. A public proof of concept demonstrates code execution.\r\n\r\nAny server that decompresses request bodies sent with \"Content-Encoding: br\" exposes the decoder to unauthenticated attackers. Known cases include Express 5 and NestJS 11 on Node.js, Koa and Fastify setups, Bun, Envoy and Istio with request decompression enabled, and any application or reverse proxy that decodes Brotli request bodies with an affected library.\r\n\r\nThe flaw also works in the other direction. A malicious server can compromise an unpatched client that decodes a Brotli response, for example Node.js fetch(), Python clients (requests, httpx, aiohttp, Scrapy) with the Brotli or brotlicffi package, or libcurl builds with Brotli support.\r\n\r\nWhat this control checks\r\n\r\nPatrowl sends small, valid Brotli-compressed requests to each asset and observes whether the server decodes them. The check does not depend on the technology: it detects the behaviour, whatever the stack behind it. These requests are what any legitimate client could send. They never reach the vulnerable code path and cannot affect the availability of the service.\r\n\r\nHow to read the result\r\n\r\nPotentially impacted means the asset decodes Brotli request bodies: the attack surface is exposed. It does not confirm that the asset is vulnerable. The version of the Brotli decoder in use is not visible from the outside.\r\n\r\nThis check covers applications that parse request bodies on their root path. A Not impacted result does not rule out exposure on other routes, nor on the client side. Checking the versions on the servers remains the only exhaustive verification.\r\n\r\nTwo situations are possible. When the decoding is done by your own application or reverse proxy, identify the component and update it. If an update is not possible right away, reject requests with \"Content-Encoding: br\" at the reverse proxy or WAF.\r\n\r\nWhen the asset is hosted on a managed platform or behind a CDN (for example Platform.sh, Upsun or Fastly), the decoding may be done by the provider's edge router, in front of your application. You cannot patch it yourself, but this router handles all the traffic of your site. Ask your provider to confirm that its edge components are patched against CVE-2026-111497. Assets hosted on a managed platform or behind a CDN carry the tag \"paas: platform.sh\" or \"cdn: fastly\" in the asset view: for these assets, the Brotli decoding is done by the provider's edge router, in front of your application, and only the provider can patch it.\r\n\r\nAffected and fixed versions\r\n\r\nGoogle Brotli 1.0.3 to 1.2.0 are affected, fixed in 1.0.10, 1.1.1 and 1.2.1. Fixed releases of the main products embedding it: Node.js 22.23.4, 24.22.1 and 26.12.1 (end-of-life lines 20.x and older and 25.x receive no fix), Bun 1.4.4, Envoy 1.37.8, 1.38.6, 1.39.3 and 1.40.0, Istio 1.29.9, 1.30.6 and 1.31.2, Python Brotli 1.2.1 and brotlicffi 1.2.1.0. Products that link against the system library depend on the Brotli package of the Linux distribution.\r\n\r\nRecommendations\r\n\r\nUpdate every component that embeds the Brotli decoder (only real fix). Start with the assets flagged by this control. Restart the processes after the update. Rebuild containers, single-executable applications and appliances that bundle an affected runtime or library.\r\n\r\nReduce the exposure until the update is deployed. Reject requests with \"Content-Encoding: br\" at the reverse proxy, load balancer or WAF, case-insensitively and including lists such as \"gzip, br\". On Envoy and Istio, disable request decompression for Brotli.\r\n\r\nContact your edge provider about the status of the pathing (Fastly \u002F Plateform.sh)\r\n\r\nReview outbound calls. List the features that fetch content from servers you do not control, and patch the services that host them first.",[16],{"id":21,"title":22,"summary":23,"published_at":24,"severity":13,"vendor":25,"products":26},263,"Oracle Java SE JSSE - Improper Access Control & Unauthorized Data Access & Unauthorized Data Modification","Oracle Java SE is the Java runtime and development platform. Its JSSE (Java Secure Socket Extension) component provides TLS\u002FSSL for secure network communication. Oracle GraalVM is a JDK distribution based on the same platform.\r\n\r\nCVE-2026-91403\r\n\r\nA vulnerability in the JSSE component of Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM for JDK and Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition can be exploited by an unauthenticated attacker with network access over multiple protocols. A successful attack can give unauthorized access to critical data and allow unauthorized creation, deletion or modification of data. It can also affect sandboxed Java Web Start applications and applets that run untrusted code. The record lists the weakness as CWE-284 (Improper Access Control) in the CISA ADP entry, while another database lists CWE-295. The record lists these affected versions:\r\n- Oracle Java SE: 8u511, 8u511-perf, 11.0.33, 17.0.21, 21.0.13, 25.0.5, 27.0.1.\r\n- Oracle GraalVM for JDK: 17.0.21, 21.0.13.\r\n- Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition: 21.3.20.\r\n\r\nOracle published an out-of-cycle Security Alert on October 21, 2026. One secondary source says the fix makes Java distrust eight compromised intermediate CA certificates shipped with the JDK. The Oracle-focused sources do not confirm this root cause, so check it against the Oracle advisory. CISA ADP SSVC data shows Exploitation: none, Automatable: yes, Technical Impact: total. The CVE is not in the CISA KEV catalog as of October 22, 2026, and its EPSS score is below 1%.","2026-10-23T14:12:32.871954Z","Oracle",[27,28,29],"Oracle Java SE","Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition","Oracle GraalVM for JDK",{"id":31,"cve_id":32,"euvd_id":33,"summary":34,"published":35,"cvss_data":36,"is_remote":47,"cwes":48,"cpes":49,"technologies":51,"references":53,"score":57,"epss_score":58,"epss_percentile":59,"is_kev":47,"cisa_kev_date_added":6,"cisa_kev_due_date":6,"cisa_ssvc":60,"attack_mappings":66,"exploits":73},317707,"CVE-2022-50011","EUVD-2022-55289","In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nvenus: pm_helpers: Fix warning in OPP during probe\n\nFix the following WARN triggered during Venus driver probe on\n5.19.0-rc8-next-20220728:\n\n WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 339 at drivers\u002Fopp\u002Fcore.c:2471 dev_pm_opp_set_config+0x49c\u002F0x610\n Modules linked in: qcom_spmi_adc5 rtc_pm8xxx qcom_spmi_adc_tm5 leds_qcom_lpg led_class_multicolor\n  qcom_pon qcom_vadc_common venus_core(+) qcom_spmi_temp_alarm v4l2_mem2mem videobuf2_v4l2 msm(+)\n  videobuf2_common crct10dif_ce spi_geni_qcom snd_soc_sm8250 i2c_qcom_geni gpu_sched\n  snd_soc_qcom_common videodev qcom_q6v5_pas soundwire_qcom drm_dp_aux_bus qcom_stats\n  drm_display_helper qcom_pil_info soundwire_bus snd_soc_lpass_va_macro mc qcom_q6v5\n  phy_qcom_snps_femto_v2 qcom_rng snd_soc_lpass_macro_common snd_soc_lpass_wsa_macro\n  lpass_gfm_sm8250 slimbus qcom_sysmon qcom_common qcom_glink_smem qmi_helpers\n  qcom_wdt mdt_loader socinfo icc_osm_l3 display_connector\n  drm_kms_helper qnoc_sm8250 drm fuse ip_tables x_tables ipv6\n CPU: 7 PID: 339 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 5.19.0-rc8-next-20220728 #4\n Hardware name: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Robotics RB5 (DT)\n pstate: 80400005 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)\n pc : dev_pm_opp_set_config+0x49c\u002F0x610\n lr : dev_pm_opp_set_config+0x58\u002F0x610\n sp : ffff8000093c3710\n x29: ffff8000093c3710 x28: ffffbca3959d82b8 x27: ffff8000093c3d00\n x26: ffffbca3959d8e08 x25: ffff4396cac98118 x24: ffff4396c0e24810\n x23: ffff4396c4272c40 x22: ffff4396c0e24810 x21: ffff8000093c3810\n x20: ffff4396cac36800 x19: ffff4396cac96800 x18: 0000000000000000\n x17: 0000000000000003 x16: ffffbca3f4edf198 x15: 0000001cba64a858\n x14: 0000000000000180 x13: 000000000000017e x12: 0000000000000000\n x11: 0000000000000002 x10: 0000000000000a60 x9 : ffff8000093c35c0\n x8 : ffff4396c4273700 x7 : ffff43983efca6c0 x6 : ffff43983efca640\n x5 : 00000000410fd0d0 x4 : ffff4396c4272c40 x3 : ffffbca3f5d1e008\n x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffff4396c2421600 x0 : ffff4396cac96860\n Call trace:\n  dev_pm_opp_set_config+0x49c\u002F0x610\n  devm_pm_opp_set_config+0x18\u002F0x70\n  vcodec_domains_get+0xb8\u002F0x1638 [venus_core]\n  core_get_v4+0x1d8\u002F0x218 [venus_core]\n  venus_probe+0xf4\u002F0x468 [venus_core]\n  platform_probe+0x68\u002F0xd8\n  really_probe+0xbc\u002F0x2a8\n  __driver_probe_device+0x78\u002F0xe0\n  driver_probe_device+0x3c\u002F0xf0\n  __driver_attach+0x70\u002F0x120\n  bus_for_each_dev+0x70\u002F0xc0\n  driver_attach+0x24\u002F0x30\n  bus_add_driver+0x150\u002F0x200\n  driver_register+0x64\u002F0x120\n  __platform_driver_register+0x28\u002F0x38\n  qcom_venus_driver_init+0x24\u002F0x1000 [venus_core]\n  do_one_initcall+0x54\u002F0x1c8\n  do_init_module+0x44\u002F0x1d0\n  load_module+0x16c8\u002F0x1aa0\n  __do_sys_finit_module+0xbc\u002F0x110\n  __arm64_sys_finit_module+0x20\u002F0x30\n  invoke_syscall+0x44\u002F0x108\n  el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xcc\u002F0xf0\n  do_el0_svc+0x2c\u002F0xb8\n  el0_svc+0x2c\u002F0x88\n  el0t_64_sync_handler+0xb8\u002F0xc0\n  el0t_64_sync+0x18c\u002F0x190\n  qcom-venus: probe of aa00000.video-codec failed with error -16\n\nThe fix is re-ordering the code related to OPP core. The OPP core\nexpects all configuration options to be provided before the OPP\ntable is added.","2025-06-18T11:15:00Z",{"cvss_v3.1":37},{"scope":38,"version":39,"baseScore":40,"attackVector":41,"baseSeverity":42,"vectorString":43,"integrityImpact":44,"userInteraction":44,"attackComplexity":45,"availabilityImpact":46,"privilegesRequired":45,"confidentialityImpact":44},"UNCHANGED","3.1",5.5,"LOCAL","MEDIUM","CVSS:3.1\u002FAV:L\u002FAC:L\u002FPR:L\u002FUI:N\u002FS:U\u002FC:N\u002FI:N\u002FA:H","NONE","LOW","HIGH",false,[],[50],"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*",[52],"Linux Linux Kernel",[54,55,56],"https:\u002F\u002Fgit.kernel.org\u002Fstable\u002Fc\u002F0bdec5eed69c73886af4cfbb94b663e1e10b8344","https:\u002F\u002Fgit.kernel.org\u002Fstable\u002Fc\u002F1d95af02f23031c2e1cca7607c514b86ce85bc6e","https:\u002F\u002Fgit.kernel.org\u002Fstable\u002Fc\u002F8d4eccd78461c3e3555bff67148432bb6c21d059",0.28,0.00243,0.15314,{"timestamp":6,"automatable":61,"tech_impact":62,"exploitation":63,"cisa_decision":64,"cisa_remediation_timeline":65},"no","partial","none",{},"FSU",[67],{"name":68,"source":69,"tactics":70,"technique_id":72},"Exploitation for Privilege Escalation","attack_vector",[71],"privilege-escalation","T1068",[],{"count":75,"next":76,"previous":6,"results":77},26,"http:\u002F\u002Fweb:8606\u002Fapi\u002Farticles\u002F?page=2&page_size=3&sorted_by=-published_at",[78,86,94],{"id":79,"title":80,"summary":81,"published_at":82,"type":83,"link":84,"image_url":85},30,"PHP2Shell: Two Critical RCE Flaws in PHP (CVSS 9.2)","Unauthenticated code execution demonstrated on WordPress, Drupal and Joomla, and reproduced in our lab. Patched versions and steps to take today.","2026-10-22T00:00:00Z","cve","https:\u002F\u002Fpatrowl.io\u002Fen\u002Fblog\u002Fphp2shell-2-critical-rce-flaws-php-cvss-9-2","https:\u002F\u002Fpatrowl.io\u002Fmedia\u002Fsite\u002Fc0615c4ee6-1792684469\u002Fphp2shell-2-critical-rce-flaws-php-cvss-9-2.png",{"id":87,"title":88,"summary":89,"published_at":90,"type":91,"link":92,"image_url":93},29,"Manage External Security Across All Your Entities","Centralize the management of entities, users and external security resources while maintaining strict data isolation with Patrowl.","2026-09-15T00:00:00Z","security tips","https:\u002F\u002Fpatrowl.io\u002Fen\u002Fblog\u002Fmulti-entity-external-security-how-structure-governance-group-level","https:\u002F\u002Fpatrowl.io\u002Fmedia\u002Fsite\u002F8b2c0cc5eb-1789551467\u002Fvisu_1_multi_tenancy_dark_1x.webp",{"id":95,"title":96,"summary":97,"published_at":98,"type":99,"link":100,"image_url":101},28,"Will AI Become the Next Hacker? Bruce Schneier Answers at DEF CON 34","Tax law, finance, legislation: Bruce Schneier shows how AI could hack human rule systems just as easily as it hacks software.","2026-09-14T00:00:00Z","hacks","https:\u002F\u002Fpatrowl.io\u002Fen\u002Fblog\u002Fbruce-schneier-def-con-34","https:\u002F\u002Fpatrowl.io\u002Fmedia\u002Fsite\u002F5c616d9db4-1789462598\u002Fai-hacker.en.png"]