New MCP server — Bring vulnerability intelligence into your AI
Back to feed

CVE-2023-26492

ExploitedNVDCIRCLENISA

EUVD-2023-1043 · Published Mar 3, 2023

Directus vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery On File Import

Summary

Directus versions <=9.22.4 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) when importing a file from a remote web server (POST to /files/import). An attacker can bypass the security controls that were implemented to patch vulnerability CVE-2022-23080 by performing a DNS rebinding attack and view sensitive data from internal servers or perform a local port scan (eg. can access internal metadata API for AWS at http://169.254.169.254 event if 169.254.169.254 is in the deny IP list).

Details

DNS rebinding attacks work by running a DNS name server that resolves two different IP addresses when a domain is resolved simultaneously. This type of attack can be exploited to bypass the IP address deny list validation that was added to /api/src/services/file.ts for the function importOne to mitigate the previous SSRF vulnerability CVE-2022-23080. The validation in /api/src/services/file.ts first checks if the resolved IP address for a domain name does not a resolve to an IP address in the deny list:

let ip = resolvedUrl.hostname;

if (net.isIP(ip) === 0) {
    try {
        ip = (await lookupDNS(ip)).address;
    } catch (err: any) {
        logger.warn(err, `Couldn't lookup the DNS for url ${importURL}`);
        throw new ServiceUnavailableException(`Couldn't fetch file from url "${importURL}"`, {
            service: 'external-file',
        });
    }
}

if (env.IMPORT_IP_DENY_LIST.includes('0.0.0.0')) {
    const networkInterfaces = os.networkInterfaces();

    for (const networkInfo of Object.values(networkInterfaces)) {
        if (!networkInfo) continue;

        for (const info of networkInfo) {
            if (info.address === ip) {
                logger.warn(`Requested URL ${importURL} resolves to localhost.`);
                throw new ServiceUnavailableException(`Couldn't fetch file from url "${importURL}"`, {
                    service: 'external-file',
                });
            }
        }
    }
}

if (env.IMPORT_IP_DENY_LIST.includes(ip)) {
    logger.warn(`Requested URL ${importURL} resolves to a denied IP address.`);
    throw new ServiceUnavailableException(`Couldn't fetch file from url "${importURL}"`, {
        service: 'external-file',
    });
}

Once it validates that the resolved IP address is not in the deny list, then it uses axios to GET the url and saves the response content.

try {
    fileResponse = await axios.get<Readable>(encodeURL(importURL), {
        responseType: 'stream',
    });
} catch (err: any) {
    logger.warn(err, `Couldn't fetch file from url "${importURL}"`);
    throw new ServiceUnavailableException(`Couldn't fetch file from url "${importURL}"`, {
        service: 'external-file',
    });
}

However, this validation check and fetching the web resource causes to DNS queries that enable a DNS rebinding attack. On the first DNS query, an attacker controlled name server can be configured to resolve to an external IP address that is not in the deny list to bypass the validation. Then when axios is called, the name server resolves the domain name to a local IP address.

PoC

To demonstrate we will be using an online tool named rebinder. Rebinder randomly changes the IP address it resolves to depending on the subdomain. For an example, 7f000001.8efa468e.rbndr.us can resolve to either 142.250.70.142 (google.com) or 127.0.0.1. Sending multiple POST requests to /files/import using this domain will eventually cause a resolution to 142.250.70.142 first to bypass the validation then fetch the sensitive from an internal server when axios is called.

The following screenshots show what it looks like when a successful attack occurs.

Downloading a file named secret.txt from a webserver running from http://127.0.0.1/secret.txt
image

Receiving the request from the internal server. Note that the incoming connection is from 127.0.0.1.
image

After downloading the file it leaks the content of the secret file.
image

Impact

An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to access highly sensitive internal server and steal sensitive information. An example is on Cloud Environments that utilise internal APIs for managing machine and privileges. For an example, if directus is hosted on AWS EC2 instance and has an IAM role assigned to the EC2 instance then an attacker can exploit this vulnerability to steal the AWS access keys to impersonate the EC2 instance using the AWS API.

Technologies

Monospace DirectusDirectus Directus

Weaknesses

CWE-918

CVSS scores

  • v3.15.0CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N

MITRE ATT&CK

Inferred

Where this vulnerability fits in an attack

Initial Access

References

Potentially impacted assets

See if this affects your attack surface

Latest trending attack

Criticalyesterday

Google Brotli decoder - Remote Code Execution via compressed requests (Exploitation Check)

This control is the second step of the Patrowl response to CVE-2026-111497 (Node2Shell). It complements the first control of 22 October 2026, which focused on the Node.js runtime, and does not replace it. Why a second control CVE-2026-111497 is an out-of-bounds write in the Google Brotli decoder, the library that decompresses Brotli ("br") data. It was first published as a Node.js vulnerability, because Node.js bundles this decoder. Later publications showed that the flaw is in the library itself. Every product that embeds an affected version of the decoder is concerned, whatever its language or vendor. A public proof of concept demonstrates code execution. Any server that decompresses request bodies sent with "Content-Encoding: br" exposes the decoder to unauthenticated attackers. Known cases include Express 5 and NestJS 11 on Node.js, Koa and Fastify setups, Bun, Envoy and Istio with request decompression enabled, and any application or reverse proxy that decodes Brotli request bodies with an affected library. The flaw also works in the other direction. A malicious server can compromise an unpatched client that decodes a Brotli response, for example Node.js fetch(), Python clients (requests, httpx, aiohttp, Scrapy) with the Brotli or brotlicffi package, or libcurl builds with Brotli support. What this control checks Patrowl sends small, valid Brotli-compressed requests to each asset and observes whether the server decodes them. The check does not depend on the technology: it detects the behaviour, whatever the stack behind it. These requests are what any legitimate client could send. They never reach the vulnerable code path and cannot affect the availability of the service. How to read the result Potentially impacted means the asset decodes Brotli request bodies: the attack surface is exposed. It does not confirm that the asset is vulnerable. The version of the Brotli decoder in use is not visible from the outside. This check covers applications that parse request bodies on their root path. A Not impacted result does not rule out exposure on other routes, nor on the client side. Checking the versions on the servers remains the only exhaustive verification. Affected and fixed versions Google Brotli 1.0.3 to 1.2.0 are affected, fixed in 1.0.10, 1.1.1 and 1.2.1. Fixed releases of the main products embedding it: Node.js 22.23.4, 24.22.1 and 26.12.1 (end-of-life lines 20.x and older and 25.x receive no fix), Bun 1.4.4, Envoy 1.37.8, 1.38.6, 1.39.3 and 1.40.0, Istio 1.29.9, 1.30.6 and 1.31.2, Python Brotli 1.2.1 and brotlicffi 1.2.1.0. Products that link against the system library depend on the Brotli package of the Linux distribution. Recommendations Update every component that embeds the Brotli decoder (only real fix). Start with the assets flagged by this control. Restart the processes after the update. Rebuild containers, single-executable applications and appliances that bundle an affected runtime or library. Reduce the exposure until the update is deployed. Reject requests with "Content-Encoding: br" at the reverse proxy, load balancer or WAF, case-insensitively and including lists such as "gzip, br". On Envoy and Istio, disable request decompression for Brotli. Review outbound calls. List the features that fetch content from servers you do not control, and patch the services that host them first.

Take 15 minutes to discover our platform with our experts

Patrowl Intel platform screenshot