[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"landing-trending":3,"cve-CVE-2023-52705":30,"landing-articles":91},{"count":4,"next":5,"previous":6,"results":7},266,"http:\u002F\u002Fweb:8606\u002Fapi\u002Ftrending_attacks\u002F?page=2&page_size=3&sorted_by=-published_at",null,[8,17,20],{"id":9,"title":10,"summary":11,"published_at":12,"severity":13,"vendor":14,"products":15},265,"Google Brotli decoder - Remote Code Execution via compressed requests (Exploitation Check)","This control is the second step of the Patrowl response to CVE-2026-111497 (Node2Shell). It complements the first control of 22 October 2026, which focused on the Node.js runtime, and does not replace it.\r\n\r\nWhy a second control\r\n\r\nCVE-2026-111497 is an out-of-bounds write in the Google Brotli decoder, the library that decompresses Brotli (\"br\") data. It was first published as a Node.js vulnerability, because Node.js bundles this decoder. Later publications showed that the flaw is in the library itself. Every product that embeds an affected version of the decoder is concerned, whatever its language or vendor. A public proof of concept demonstrates code execution.\r\n\r\nAny server that decompresses request bodies sent with \"Content-Encoding: br\" exposes the decoder to unauthenticated attackers. Known cases include Express 5 and NestJS 11 on Node.js, Koa and Fastify setups, Bun, Envoy and Istio with request decompression enabled, and any application or reverse proxy that decodes Brotli request bodies with an affected library.\r\n\r\nThe flaw also works in the other direction. A malicious server can compromise an unpatched client that decodes a Brotli response, for example Node.js fetch(), Python clients (requests, httpx, aiohttp, Scrapy) with the Brotli or brotlicffi package, or libcurl builds with Brotli support.\r\n\r\nWhat this control checks\r\n\r\nPatrowl sends small, valid Brotli-compressed requests to each asset and observes whether the server decodes them. The check does not depend on the technology: it detects the behaviour, whatever the stack behind it. These requests are what any legitimate client could send. They never reach the vulnerable code path and cannot affect the availability of the service.\r\n\r\nHow to read the result\r\n\r\nPotentially impacted means the asset decodes Brotli request bodies: the attack surface is exposed. It does not confirm that the asset is vulnerable. The version of the Brotli decoder in use is not visible from the outside.\r\n\r\nThis check covers applications that parse request bodies on their root path. A Not impacted result does not rule out exposure on other routes, nor on the client side. Checking the versions on the servers remains the only exhaustive verification.\r\n\r\nAffected and fixed versions\r\n\r\nGoogle Brotli 1.0.3 to 1.2.0 are affected, fixed in 1.0.10, 1.1.1 and 1.2.1. Fixed releases of the main products embedding it: Node.js 22.23.4, 24.22.1 and 26.12.1 (end-of-life lines 20.x and older and 25.x receive no fix), Bun 1.4.4, Envoy 1.37.8, 1.38.6, 1.39.3 and 1.40.0, Istio 1.29.9, 1.30.6 and 1.31.2, Python Brotli 1.2.1 and brotlicffi 1.2.1.0. Products that link against the system library depend on the Brotli package of the Linux distribution.\r\n\r\nRecommendations\r\n\r\nUpdate every component that embeds the Brotli decoder (only real fix). Start with the assets flagged by this control. Restart the processes after the update. Rebuild containers, single-executable applications and appliances that bundle an affected runtime or library.\r\n\r\nReduce the exposure until the update is deployed. Reject requests with \"Content-Encoding: br\" at the reverse proxy, load balancer or WAF, case-insensitively and including lists such as \"gzip, br\". On Envoy and Istio, disable request decompression for Brotli.\r\n\r\nReview outbound calls. List the features that fetch content from servers you do not control, and patch the services that host them first.","2026-10-24T10:37:22.192753Z",4,"google",[16],"brotli",{"id":4,"title":10,"summary":18,"published_at":12,"severity":13,"vendor":14,"products":19},"This control is the second step of the Patrowl response to CVE-2026-111497 (Node2Shell). It complements the first control of 22 October 2026, which focused on the Node.js runtime, and does not replace it.\r\n\r\nWhy a second control\r\n\r\nCVE-2026-111497 is an out-of-bounds write in the Google Brotli decoder, the library that decompresses Brotli (\"br\") data. It was first published as a Node.js vulnerability, because Node.js bundles this decoder. Later publications showed that the flaw is in the library itself. Every product that embeds an affected version of the decoder is concerned, whatever its language or vendor. A public proof of concept demonstrates code execution.\r\n\r\nAny server that decompresses request bodies sent with \"Content-Encoding: br\" exposes the decoder to unauthenticated attackers. Known cases include Express 5 and NestJS 11 on Node.js, Koa and Fastify setups, Bun, Envoy and Istio with request decompression enabled, and any application or reverse proxy that decodes Brotli request bodies with an affected library.\r\n\r\nThe flaw also works in the other direction. A malicious server can compromise an unpatched client that decodes a Brotli response, for example Node.js fetch(), Python clients (requests, httpx, aiohttp, Scrapy) with the Brotli or brotlicffi package, or libcurl builds with Brotli support.\r\n\r\nWhat this control checks\r\n\r\nPatrowl sends small, valid Brotli-compressed requests to each asset and observes whether the server decodes them. The check does not depend on the technology: it detects the behaviour, whatever the stack behind it. These requests are what any legitimate client could send. They never reach the vulnerable code path and cannot affect the availability of the service.\r\n\r\nHow to read the result\r\n\r\nPotentially impacted means the asset decodes Brotli request bodies: the attack surface is exposed. It does not confirm that the asset is vulnerable. The version of the Brotli decoder in use is not visible from the outside.\r\n\r\nThis check covers applications that parse request bodies on their root path. A Not impacted result does not rule out exposure on other routes, nor on the client side. Checking the versions on the servers remains the only exhaustive verification.\r\n\r\nTwo situations are possible. When the decoding is done by your own application or reverse proxy, identify the component and update it. If an update is not possible right away, reject requests with \"Content-Encoding: br\" at the reverse proxy or WAF.\r\n\r\nWhen the asset is hosted on a managed platform or behind a CDN (for example Platform.sh, Upsun or Fastly), the decoding may be done by the provider's edge router, in front of your application. You cannot patch it yourself, but this router handles all the traffic of your site. Ask your provider to confirm that its edge components are patched against CVE-2026-111497. Assets hosted on a managed platform or behind a CDN carry the tag \"paas: platform.sh\" or \"cdn: fastly\" in the asset view: for these assets, the Brotli decoding is done by the provider's edge router, in front of your application, and only the provider can patch it.\r\n\r\nAffected and fixed versions\r\n\r\nGoogle Brotli 1.0.3 to 1.2.0 are affected, fixed in 1.0.10, 1.1.1 and 1.2.1. Fixed releases of the main products embedding it: Node.js 22.23.4, 24.22.1 and 26.12.1 (end-of-life lines 20.x and older and 25.x receive no fix), Bun 1.4.4, Envoy 1.37.8, 1.38.6, 1.39.3 and 1.40.0, Istio 1.29.9, 1.30.6 and 1.31.2, Python Brotli 1.2.1 and brotlicffi 1.2.1.0. Products that link against the system library depend on the Brotli package of the Linux distribution.\r\n\r\nRecommendations\r\n\r\nUpdate every component that embeds the Brotli decoder (only real fix). Start with the assets flagged by this control. Restart the processes after the update. Rebuild containers, single-executable applications and appliances that bundle an affected runtime or library.\r\n\r\nReduce the exposure until the update is deployed. Reject requests with \"Content-Encoding: br\" at the reverse proxy, load balancer or WAF, case-insensitively and including lists such as \"gzip, br\". On Envoy and Istio, disable request decompression for Brotli.\r\n\r\nContact your edge provider about the status of the pathing (Fastly \u002F Plateform.sh)\r\n\r\nReview outbound calls. List the features that fetch content from servers you do not control, and patch the services that host them first.",[16],{"id":21,"title":22,"summary":23,"published_at":24,"severity":13,"vendor":25,"products":26},263,"Oracle Java SE JSSE - Improper Access Control & Unauthorized Data Access & Unauthorized Data Modification","Oracle Java SE is the Java runtime and development platform. Its JSSE (Java Secure Socket Extension) component provides TLS\u002FSSL for secure network communication. Oracle GraalVM is a JDK distribution based on the same platform.\r\n\r\nCVE-2026-91403\r\n\r\nA vulnerability in the JSSE component of Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM for JDK and Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition can be exploited by an unauthenticated attacker with network access over multiple protocols. A successful attack can give unauthorized access to critical data and allow unauthorized creation, deletion or modification of data. It can also affect sandboxed Java Web Start applications and applets that run untrusted code. The record lists the weakness as CWE-284 (Improper Access Control) in the CISA ADP entry, while another database lists CWE-295. The record lists these affected versions:\r\n- Oracle Java SE: 8u511, 8u511-perf, 11.0.33, 17.0.21, 21.0.13, 25.0.5, 27.0.1.\r\n- Oracle GraalVM for JDK: 17.0.21, 21.0.13.\r\n- Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition: 21.3.20.\r\n\r\nOracle published an out-of-cycle Security Alert on October 21, 2026. One secondary source says the fix makes Java distrust eight compromised intermediate CA certificates shipped with the JDK. The Oracle-focused sources do not confirm this root cause, so check it against the Oracle advisory. CISA ADP SSVC data shows Exploitation: none, Automatable: yes, Technical Impact: total. The CVE is not in the CISA KEV catalog as of October 22, 2026, and its EPSS score is below 1%.","2026-10-23T14:12:32.871954Z","Oracle",[27,28,29],"Oracle Java SE","Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition","Oracle GraalVM for JDK",{"id":31,"cve_id":32,"euvd_id":33,"summary":34,"published":35,"cvss_data":36,"is_remote":47,"cwes":48,"cpes":50,"technologies":60,"references":62,"score":70,"epss_score":71,"epss_percentile":72,"is_kev":47,"cisa_kev_date_added":6,"cisa_kev_due_date":6,"cisa_ssvc":73,"attack_mappings":83,"exploits":90},330952,"CVE-2023-52705","EUVD-2023-57329","In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nnilfs2: fix underflow in second superblock position calculations\n\nMacro NILFS_SB2_OFFSET_BYTES, which computes the position of the second\nsuperblock, underflows when the argument device size is less than 4096\nbytes.  Therefore, when using this macro, it is necessary to check in\nadvance that the device size is not less than a lower limit, or at least\nthat underflow does not occur.\n\nThe current nilfs2 implementation lacks this check, causing out-of-bound\nblock access when mounting devices smaller than 4096 bytes:\n\n I\u002FO error, dev loop0, sector 36028797018963960 op 0x0:(READ) flags 0x0\n phys_seg 1 prio class 2\n NILFS (loop0): unable to read secondary superblock (blocksize = 1024)\n\nIn addition, when trying to resize the filesystem to a size below 4096\nbytes, this underflow occurs in nilfs_resize_fs(), passing a huge number\nof segments to nilfs_sufile_resize(), corrupting parameters such as the\nnumber of segments in superblocks.  This causes excessive loop iterations\nin nilfs_sufile_resize() during a subsequent resize ioctl, causing\nsemaphore ns_segctor_sem to block for a long time and hang the writer\nthread:\n\n INFO: task segctord:5067 blocked for more than 143 seconds.\n      Not tainted 6.2.0-rc8-syzkaller-00015-gf6feea56f66d #0\n \"echo 0 > \u002Fproc\u002Fsys\u002Fkernel\u002Fhung_task_timeout_secs\" disables this message.\n task:segctord        state:D stack:23456 pid:5067  ppid:2\n flags:0x00004000\n Call Trace:\n  \u003CTASK>\n  context_switch kernel\u002Fsched\u002Fcore.c:5293 [inline]\n  __schedule+0x1409\u002F0x43f0 kernel\u002Fsched\u002Fcore.c:6606\n  schedule+0xc3\u002F0x190 kernel\u002Fsched\u002Fcore.c:6682\n  rwsem_down_write_slowpath+0xfcf\u002F0x14a0 kernel\u002Flocking\u002Frwsem.c:1190\n  nilfs_transaction_lock+0x25c\u002F0x4f0 fs\u002Fnilfs2\u002Fsegment.c:357\n  nilfs_segctor_thread_construct fs\u002Fnilfs2\u002Fsegment.c:2486 [inline]\n  nilfs_segctor_thread+0x52f\u002F0x1140 fs\u002Fnilfs2\u002Fsegment.c:2570\n  kthread+0x270\u002F0x300 kernel\u002Fkthread.c:376\n  ret_from_fork+0x1f\u002F0x30 arch\u002Fx86\u002Fentry\u002Fentry_64.S:308\n  \u003C\u002FTASK>\n ...\n Call Trace:\n  \u003CTASK>\n  folio_mark_accessed+0x51c\u002F0xf00 mm\u002Fswap.c:515\n  __nilfs_get_page_block fs\u002Fnilfs2\u002Fpage.c:42 [inline]\n  nilfs_grab_buffer+0x3d3\u002F0x540 fs\u002Fnilfs2\u002Fpage.c:61\n  nilfs_mdt_submit_block+0xd7\u002F0x8f0 fs\u002Fnilfs2\u002Fmdt.c:121\n  nilfs_mdt_read_block+0xeb\u002F0x430 fs\u002Fnilfs2\u002Fmdt.c:176\n  nilfs_mdt_get_block+0x12d\u002F0xbb0 fs\u002Fnilfs2\u002Fmdt.c:251\n  nilfs_sufile_get_segment_usage_block fs\u002Fnilfs2\u002Fsufile.c:92 [inline]\n  nilfs_sufile_truncate_range fs\u002Fnilfs2\u002Fsufile.c:679 [inline]\n  nilfs_sufile_resize+0x7a3\u002F0x12b0 fs\u002Fnilfs2\u002Fsufile.c:777\n  nilfs_resize_fs+0x20c\u002F0xed0 fs\u002Fnilfs2\u002Fsuper.c:422\n  nilfs_ioctl_resize fs\u002Fnilfs2\u002Fioctl.c:1033 [inline]\n  nilfs_ioctl+0x137c\u002F0x2440 fs\u002Fnilfs2\u002Fioctl.c:1301\n  ...\n\nThis fixes these issues by inserting appropriate minimum device size\nchecks or anti-underflow checks, depending on where the macro is used.","2024-05-21T16:15:00Z",{"cvss_v3.1":37},{"scope":38,"version":39,"baseScore":40,"attackVector":41,"baseSeverity":42,"vectorString":43,"integrityImpact":44,"userInteraction":44,"attackComplexity":45,"availabilityImpact":46,"privilegesRequired":45,"confidentialityImpact":44},"UNCHANGED","3.1",5.5,"LOCAL","MEDIUM","CVSS:3.1\u002FAV:L\u002FAC:L\u002FPR:L\u002FUI:N\u002FS:U\u002FC:N\u002FI:N\u002FA:H","NONE","LOW","HIGH",false,[49],"CWE-191",[51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59],"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.2:rc7:*:*:*:*:*:*","cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.2:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*","cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.2:rc8:*:*:*:*:*:*","cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.2:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*","cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.2:rc6:*:*:*:*:*:*","cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.2:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*","cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.2:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*","cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.2:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",[61],"Linux Linux Kernel",[63,64,65,66,67,68,69],"https:\u002F\u002Fgit.kernel.org\u002Fstable\u002Fc\u002F0ee5ed0126a2211f7174492da2ca2c29f43755c5","https:\u002F\u002Fgit.kernel.org\u002Fstable\u002Fc\u002F2f7a1135b202977b82457adde7db6c390056863b","https:\u002F\u002Fgit.kernel.org\u002Fstable\u002Fc\u002F52844d8382cd9166d708032def8905ffc3ae550f","https:\u002F\u002Fgit.kernel.org\u002Fstable\u002Fc\u002F99b9402a36f0799f25feee4465bfa4b8dfa74b4d","https:\u002F\u002Fgit.kernel.org\u002Fstable\u002Fc\u002Fa158782b56b070485d54d25fc9aaf2c8f3752205","https:\u002F\u002Fgit.kernel.org\u002Fstable\u002Fc\u002Fa8ef5109f93cea9933bbac0455d8c18757b3fcb4","https:\u002F\u002Fgit.kernel.org\u002Fstable\u002Fc\u002Fb96591e2c35c8b47db0ec816b5fc6cb8868000ff",0.28,0.00252,0.16463,{"timestamp":74,"automatable":75,"tech_impact":76,"exploitation":77,"cisa_decision":78,"cisa_remediation_timeline":82},"2024-05-21T17:32:06.834863Z","no","partial","none",{"vector":79,"decision":80,"priority":81},"CISAv1\u002FE:N\u002FA:N\u002FT:P\u002FM:H\u002F2026-10-26T04:10:18.573702\u002F","track_star","medium","60D",[84],{"name":85,"source":86,"tactics":87,"technique_id":89},"Exploitation for Privilege Escalation","attack_vector",[88],"privilege-escalation","T1068",[],{"count":92,"next":93,"previous":6,"results":94},26,"http:\u002F\u002Fweb:8606\u002Fapi\u002Farticles\u002F?page=2&page_size=3&sorted_by=-published_at",[95,103,111],{"id":96,"title":97,"summary":98,"published_at":99,"type":100,"link":101,"image_url":102},30,"PHP2Shell: Two Critical RCE Flaws in PHP (CVSS 9.2)","Unauthenticated code execution demonstrated on WordPress, Drupal and Joomla, and reproduced in our lab. Patched versions and steps to take today.","2026-10-22T00:00:00Z","cve","https:\u002F\u002Fpatrowl.io\u002Fen\u002Fblog\u002Fphp2shell-2-critical-rce-flaws-php-cvss-9-2","https:\u002F\u002Fpatrowl.io\u002Fmedia\u002Fsite\u002Fc0615c4ee6-1792684469\u002Fphp2shell-2-critical-rce-flaws-php-cvss-9-2.png",{"id":104,"title":105,"summary":106,"published_at":107,"type":108,"link":109,"image_url":110},29,"Manage External Security Across All Your Entities","Centralize the management of entities, users and external security resources while maintaining strict data isolation with Patrowl.","2026-09-15T00:00:00Z","security tips","https:\u002F\u002Fpatrowl.io\u002Fen\u002Fblog\u002Fmulti-entity-external-security-how-structure-governance-group-level","https:\u002F\u002Fpatrowl.io\u002Fmedia\u002Fsite\u002F8b2c0cc5eb-1789551467\u002Fvisu_1_multi_tenancy_dark_1x.webp",{"id":112,"title":113,"summary":114,"published_at":115,"type":116,"link":117,"image_url":118},28,"Will AI Become the Next Hacker? Bruce Schneier Answers at DEF CON 34","Tax law, finance, legislation: Bruce Schneier shows how AI could hack human rule systems just as easily as it hacks software.","2026-09-14T00:00:00Z","hacks","https:\u002F\u002Fpatrowl.io\u002Fen\u002Fblog\u002Fbruce-schneier-def-con-34","https:\u002F\u002Fpatrowl.io\u002Fmedia\u002Fsite\u002F5c616d9db4-1789462598\u002Fai-hacker.en.png"]