[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"landing-trending":3,"cve-CVE-2024-26743":30,"landing-articles":136},{"count":4,"next":5,"previous":6,"results":7},266,"http:\u002F\u002Fweb:8606\u002Fapi\u002Ftrending_attacks\u002F?page=2&page_size=3&sorted_by=-published_at",null,[8,17,20],{"id":9,"title":10,"summary":11,"published_at":12,"severity":13,"vendor":14,"products":15},265,"Google Brotli decoder - Remote Code Execution via compressed requests (Exploitation Check)","This control is the second step of the Patrowl response to CVE-2026-111497 (Node2Shell). It complements the first control of 22 October 2026, which focused on the Node.js runtime, and does not replace it.\r\n\r\nWhy a second control\r\n\r\nCVE-2026-111497 is an out-of-bounds write in the Google Brotli decoder, the library that decompresses Brotli (\"br\") data. It was first published as a Node.js vulnerability, because Node.js bundles this decoder. Later publications showed that the flaw is in the library itself. Every product that embeds an affected version of the decoder is concerned, whatever its language or vendor. A public proof of concept demonstrates code execution.\r\n\r\nAny server that decompresses request bodies sent with \"Content-Encoding: br\" exposes the decoder to unauthenticated attackers. Known cases include Express 5 and NestJS 11 on Node.js, Koa and Fastify setups, Bun, Envoy and Istio with request decompression enabled, and any application or reverse proxy that decodes Brotli request bodies with an affected library.\r\n\r\nThe flaw also works in the other direction. A malicious server can compromise an unpatched client that decodes a Brotli response, for example Node.js fetch(), Python clients (requests, httpx, aiohttp, Scrapy) with the Brotli or brotlicffi package, or libcurl builds with Brotli support.\r\n\r\nWhat this control checks\r\n\r\nPatrowl sends small, valid Brotli-compressed requests to each asset and observes whether the server decodes them. The check does not depend on the technology: it detects the behaviour, whatever the stack behind it. These requests are what any legitimate client could send. They never reach the vulnerable code path and cannot affect the availability of the service.\r\n\r\nHow to read the result\r\n\r\nPotentially impacted means the asset decodes Brotli request bodies: the attack surface is exposed. It does not confirm that the asset is vulnerable. The version of the Brotli decoder in use is not visible from the outside.\r\n\r\nThis check covers applications that parse request bodies on their root path. A Not impacted result does not rule out exposure on other routes, nor on the client side. Checking the versions on the servers remains the only exhaustive verification.\r\n\r\nAffected and fixed versions\r\n\r\nGoogle Brotli 1.0.3 to 1.2.0 are affected, fixed in 1.0.10, 1.1.1 and 1.2.1. Fixed releases of the main products embedding it: Node.js 22.23.4, 24.22.1 and 26.12.1 (end-of-life lines 20.x and older and 25.x receive no fix), Bun 1.4.4, Envoy 1.37.8, 1.38.6, 1.39.3 and 1.40.0, Istio 1.29.9, 1.30.6 and 1.31.2, Python Brotli 1.2.1 and brotlicffi 1.2.1.0. Products that link against the system library depend on the Brotli package of the Linux distribution.\r\n\r\nRecommendations\r\n\r\nUpdate every component that embeds the Brotli decoder (only real fix). Start with the assets flagged by this control. Restart the processes after the update. Rebuild containers, single-executable applications and appliances that bundle an affected runtime or library.\r\n\r\nReduce the exposure until the update is deployed. Reject requests with \"Content-Encoding: br\" at the reverse proxy, load balancer or WAF, case-insensitively and including lists such as \"gzip, br\". On Envoy and Istio, disable request decompression for Brotli.\r\n\r\nReview outbound calls. List the features that fetch content from servers you do not control, and patch the services that host them first.","2026-10-24T10:37:22.192753Z",4,"google",[16],"brotli",{"id":4,"title":10,"summary":18,"published_at":12,"severity":13,"vendor":14,"products":19},"This control is the second step of the Patrowl response to CVE-2026-111497 (Node2Shell). It complements the first control of 22 October 2026, which focused on the Node.js runtime, and does not replace it.\r\n\r\nWhy a second control\r\n\r\nCVE-2026-111497 is an out-of-bounds write in the Google Brotli decoder, the library that decompresses Brotli (\"br\") data. It was first published as a Node.js vulnerability, because Node.js bundles this decoder. Later publications showed that the flaw is in the library itself. Every product that embeds an affected version of the decoder is concerned, whatever its language or vendor. A public proof of concept demonstrates code execution.\r\n\r\nAny server that decompresses request bodies sent with \"Content-Encoding: br\" exposes the decoder to unauthenticated attackers. Known cases include Express 5 and NestJS 11 on Node.js, Koa and Fastify setups, Bun, Envoy and Istio with request decompression enabled, and any application or reverse proxy that decodes Brotli request bodies with an affected library.\r\n\r\nThe flaw also works in the other direction. A malicious server can compromise an unpatched client that decodes a Brotli response, for example Node.js fetch(), Python clients (requests, httpx, aiohttp, Scrapy) with the Brotli or brotlicffi package, or libcurl builds with Brotli support.\r\n\r\nWhat this control checks\r\n\r\nPatrowl sends small, valid Brotli-compressed requests to each asset and observes whether the server decodes them. The check does not depend on the technology: it detects the behaviour, whatever the stack behind it. These requests are what any legitimate client could send. They never reach the vulnerable code path and cannot affect the availability of the service.\r\n\r\nHow to read the result\r\n\r\nPotentially impacted means the asset decodes Brotli request bodies: the attack surface is exposed. It does not confirm that the asset is vulnerable. The version of the Brotli decoder in use is not visible from the outside.\r\n\r\nThis check covers applications that parse request bodies on their root path. A Not impacted result does not rule out exposure on other routes, nor on the client side. Checking the versions on the servers remains the only exhaustive verification.\r\n\r\nTwo situations are possible. When the decoding is done by your own application or reverse proxy, identify the component and update it. If an update is not possible right away, reject requests with \"Content-Encoding: br\" at the reverse proxy or WAF.\r\n\r\nWhen the asset is hosted on a managed platform or behind a CDN (for example Platform.sh, Upsun or Fastly), the decoding may be done by the provider's edge router, in front of your application. You cannot patch it yourself, but this router handles all the traffic of your site. Ask your provider to confirm that its edge components are patched against CVE-2026-111497. Assets hosted on a managed platform or behind a CDN carry the tag \"paas: platform.sh\" or \"cdn: fastly\" in the asset view: for these assets, the Brotli decoding is done by the provider's edge router, in front of your application, and only the provider can patch it.\r\n\r\nAffected and fixed versions\r\n\r\nGoogle Brotli 1.0.3 to 1.2.0 are affected, fixed in 1.0.10, 1.1.1 and 1.2.1. Fixed releases of the main products embedding it: Node.js 22.23.4, 24.22.1 and 26.12.1 (end-of-life lines 20.x and older and 25.x receive no fix), Bun 1.4.4, Envoy 1.37.8, 1.38.6, 1.39.3 and 1.40.0, Istio 1.29.9, 1.30.6 and 1.31.2, Python Brotli 1.2.1 and brotlicffi 1.2.1.0. Products that link against the system library depend on the Brotli package of the Linux distribution.\r\n\r\nRecommendations\r\n\r\nUpdate every component that embeds the Brotli decoder (only real fix). Start with the assets flagged by this control. Restart the processes after the update. Rebuild containers, single-executable applications and appliances that bundle an affected runtime or library.\r\n\r\nReduce the exposure until the update is deployed. Reject requests with \"Content-Encoding: br\" at the reverse proxy, load balancer or WAF, case-insensitively and including lists such as \"gzip, br\". On Envoy and Istio, disable request decompression for Brotli.\r\n\r\nContact your edge provider about the status of the pathing (Fastly \u002F Plateform.sh)\r\n\r\nReview outbound calls. List the features that fetch content from servers you do not control, and patch the services that host them first.",[16],{"id":21,"title":22,"summary":23,"published_at":24,"severity":13,"vendor":25,"products":26},263,"Oracle Java SE JSSE - Improper Access Control & Unauthorized Data Access & Unauthorized Data Modification","Oracle Java SE is the Java runtime and development platform. Its JSSE (Java Secure Socket Extension) component provides TLS\u002FSSL for secure network communication. Oracle GraalVM is a JDK distribution based on the same platform.\r\n\r\nCVE-2026-91403\r\n\r\nA vulnerability in the JSSE component of Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM for JDK and Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition can be exploited by an unauthenticated attacker with network access over multiple protocols. A successful attack can give unauthorized access to critical data and allow unauthorized creation, deletion or modification of data. It can also affect sandboxed Java Web Start applications and applets that run untrusted code. The record lists the weakness as CWE-284 (Improper Access Control) in the CISA ADP entry, while another database lists CWE-295. The record lists these affected versions:\r\n- Oracle Java SE: 8u511, 8u511-perf, 11.0.33, 17.0.21, 21.0.13, 25.0.5, 27.0.1.\r\n- Oracle GraalVM for JDK: 17.0.21, 21.0.13.\r\n- Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition: 21.3.20.\r\n\r\nOracle published an out-of-cycle Security Alert on October 21, 2026. One secondary source says the fix makes Java distrust eight compromised intermediate CA certificates shipped with the JDK. The Oracle-focused sources do not confirm this root cause, so check it against the Oracle advisory. CISA ADP SSVC data shows Exploitation: none, Automatable: yes, Technical Impact: total. The CVE is not in the CISA KEV catalog as of October 22, 2026, and its EPSS score is below 1%.","2026-10-23T14:12:32.871954Z","Oracle",[27,28,29],"Oracle Java SE","Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition","Oracle GraalVM for JDK",{"id":31,"cve_id":32,"euvd_id":33,"summary":34,"published":35,"cvss_data":36,"is_remote":47,"cwes":48,"cpes":50,"technologies":58,"references":61,"score":69,"epss_score":70,"epss_percentile":71,"is_kev":47,"cisa_kev_date_added":6,"cisa_kev_due_date":6,"cisa_ssvc":72,"attack_mappings":82,"exploits":135},43721,"CVE-2024-26743","EUVD-2024-24005","In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nRDMA\u002Fqedr: Fix qedr_create_user_qp error flow\n\nAvoid the following warning by making sure to free the allocated\nresources in case that qedr_init_user_queue() fail.\n\n-----------[ cut here ]-----------\nWARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 143192 at drivers\u002Finfiniband\u002Fcore\u002Frdma_core.c:874 uverbs_destroy_ufile_hw+0xcf\u002F0xf0 [ib_uverbs]\nModules linked in: tls target_core_user uio target_core_pscsi target_core_file target_core_iblock ib_srpt ib_srp scsi_transport_srp nfsd nfs_acl rpcsec_gss_krb5 auth_rpcgss nfsv4 dns_resolver nfs lockd grace fscache netfs 8021q garp mrp stp llc ext4 mbcache jbd2 opa_vnic ib_umad ib_ipoib sunrpc rdma_ucm ib_isert iscsi_target_mod target_core_mod ib_iser libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi rdma_cm iw_cm ib_cm hfi1 intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common mgag200 qedr sb_edac drm_shmem_helper rdmavt x86_pkg_temp_thermal drm_kms_helper intel_powerclamp ib_uverbs coretemp i2c_algo_bit kvm_intel dell_wmi_descriptor ipmi_ssif sparse_keymap kvm ib_core rfkill syscopyarea sysfillrect video sysimgblt irqbypass ipmi_si ipmi_devintf fb_sys_fops rapl iTCO_wdt mxm_wmi iTCO_vendor_support intel_cstate pcspkr dcdbas intel_uncore ipmi_msghandler lpc_ich acpi_power_meter mei_me mei fuse drm xfs libcrc32c qede sd_mod ahci libahci t10_pi sg crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul crc32c_intel qed libata tg3\nghash_clmulni_intel megaraid_sas crc8 wmi [last unloaded: ib_srpt]\nCPU: 0 PID: 143192 Comm: fi_rdm_tagged_p Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.14.0-408.el9.x86_64 #1\nHardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R430\u002F03XKDV, BIOS 2.14.0 01\u002F25\u002F2022\nRIP: 0010:uverbs_destroy_ufile_hw+0xcf\u002F0xf0 [ib_uverbs]\nCode: 5d 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e e9 0f 26 1b dd 48 89 df e8 67 6a ff ff 49 8b 86 10 01 00 00 48 85 c0 74 9c 4c 89 e7 e8 83 c0 cb dd eb 92 \u003C0f> 0b eb be 0f 0b be 04 00 00 00 48 89 df e8 8e f5 ff ff e9 6d ff\nRSP: 0018:ffffb7c6cadfbc60 EFLAGS: 00010286\nRAX: ffff8f0889ee3f60 RBX: ffff8f088c1a5200 RCX: 00000000802a0016\nRDX: 00000000802a0017 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff8f0880042600\nRBP: 0000000000000001 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000\nR10: ffff8f11fffd5000 R11: 0000000000039000 R12: ffff8f0d5b36cd80\nR13: ffff8f088c1a5250 R14: ffff8f1206d91000 R15: 0000000000000000\nFS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8f11d7c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000\nCS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033\nCR2: 0000147069200e20 CR3: 00000001c7210002 CR4: 00000000001706f0\nCall Trace:\n\u003CTASK>\n? show_trace_log_lvl+0x1c4\u002F0x2df\n? show_trace_log_lvl+0x1c4\u002F0x2df\n? ib_uverbs_close+0x1f\u002F0xb0 [ib_uverbs]\n? uverbs_destroy_ufile_hw+0xcf\u002F0xf0 [ib_uverbs]\n? __warn+0x81\u002F0x110\n? uverbs_destroy_ufile_hw+0xcf\u002F0xf0 [ib_uverbs]\n? report_bug+0x10a\u002F0x140\n? handle_bug+0x3c\u002F0x70\n? exc_invalid_op+0x14\u002F0x70\n? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16\u002F0x20\n? uverbs_destroy_ufile_hw+0xcf\u002F0xf0 [ib_uverbs]\nib_uverbs_close+0x1f\u002F0xb0 [ib_uverbs]\n__fput+0x94\u002F0x250\ntask_work_run+0x5c\u002F0x90\ndo_exit+0x270\u002F0x4a0\ndo_group_exit+0x2d\u002F0x90\nget_signal+0x87c\u002F0x8c0\narch_do_signal_or_restart+0x25\u002F0x100\n? ib_uverbs_ioctl+0xc2\u002F0x110 [ib_uverbs]\nexit_to_user_mode_loop+0x9c\u002F0x130\nexit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xb6\u002F0x100\nsyscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x12\u002F0x40\ndo_syscall_64+0x69\u002F0x90\n? syscall_exit_work+0x103\u002F0x130\n? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x22\u002F0x40\n? do_syscall_64+0x69\u002F0x90\n? syscall_exit_work+0x103\u002F0x130\n? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x22\u002F0x40\n? do_syscall_64+0x69\u002F0x90\n? do_syscall_64+0x69\u002F0x90\n? common_interrupt+0x43\u002F0xa0\nentry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72\u002F0xdc\nRIP: 0033:0x1470abe3ec6b\nCode: Unable to access opcode bytes at RIP 0x1470abe3ec41.\nRSP: 002b:00007fff13ce9108 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010\nRAX: fffffffffffffffc RBX: 00007fff13ce9218 RCX: 00001470abe3ec6b\nRDX: 00007fff13ce9200 RSI: 00000000c0181b01 RDI: 0000000000000004\nRBP: 00007fff13ce91e0 R08: 0000558d9655da10 R09: 0000558d9655dd00\nR10: 00007fff13ce95c0 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fff13ce9358\nR13: 0000000000000013 R14: 0000558d9655db50 R15: 00007fff13ce9470\n\u003C\u002FTASK>\n--[ end trace 888a9b92e04c5c97 ]--","2024-04-03T17:15:00Z",{"cvss_v3.1":37},{"scope":38,"version":39,"baseScore":40,"attackVector":41,"baseSeverity":42,"vectorString":43,"integrityImpact":44,"userInteraction":44,"attackComplexity":45,"availabilityImpact":46,"privilegesRequired":45,"confidentialityImpact":44},"UNCHANGED","3.1",5.5,"LOCAL","MEDIUM","CVSS:3.1\u002FAV:L\u002FAC:L\u002FPR:L\u002FUI:N\u002FS:U\u002FC:N\u002FI:N\u002FA:H","NONE","LOW","HIGH",false,[49],"CWE-770",[51,52,53,54,55,56,57],"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*","cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*","cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8:rc4:*:*:*:*:*:*","cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8:rc5:*:*:*:*:*:*","cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.8:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*",[59,60],"Linux Linux Kernel","Debian Debian Linux",[62,63,64,65,66,67,68],"https:\u002F\u002Fgit.kernel.org\u002Fstable\u002Fc\u002F135e5465fefa463c5ec93c4eede48b9fedac894a","https:\u002F\u002Fgit.kernel.org\u002Fstable\u002Fc\u002F5639414a52a29336ffa1ede80a67c6d927acbc5a","https:\u002F\u002Fgit.kernel.org\u002Fstable\u002Fc\u002F5ba4e6d5863c53e937f49932dee0ecb004c65928","https:\u002F\u002Fgit.kernel.org\u002Fstable\u002Fc\u002F7f31a244c753aacf40b71d01f03ca6742f81bbbc","https:\u002F\u002Fgit.kernel.org\u002Fstable\u002Fc\u002F95175dda017cd4982cd47960536fa1de003d3298","https:\u002F\u002Fgit.kernel.org\u002Fstable\u002Fc\u002Fbab8875c06ebda5e01c5c4cab30022aed85c14e6","https:\u002F\u002Flists.debian.org\u002Fdebian-lts-announce\u002F2024\u002F06\u002Fmsg00017.html",0.28,0.00242,0.15261,{"timestamp":73,"automatable":74,"tech_impact":75,"exploitation":76,"cisa_decision":77,"cisa_remediation_timeline":81},"2024-06-17T19:28:14.309187Z","no","partial","none",{"vector":78,"decision":79,"priority":80},"CISAv1\u002FE:N\u002FA:N\u002FT:P\u002FM:H\u002F2026-10-26T07:38:27.384924\u002F","track_star","medium","60D",[83,89,100,107,113,119,128],{"name":84,"source":85,"tactics":86,"technique_id":88},"Exploitation for Privilege Escalation","attack_vector",[87],"privilege-escalation","T1068",{"name":90,"source":91,"cwe_ids":92,"tactics":93,"capec_ids":95,"technique_id":99},"Direct Network Flood","capec",[49],[94],"impact",[96,97,98],"CAPEC-125","CAPEC-482","CAPEC-528","T1498.001",{"name":101,"source":91,"cwe_ids":102,"tactics":103,"capec_ids":104,"technique_id":106},"Reflection Amplification",[49],[94],[105],"CAPEC-490","T1498.002",{"name":108,"source":91,"cwe_ids":109,"tactics":110,"capec_ids":111,"technique_id":112},"Endpoint Denial of Service",[49],[94],[96],"T1499",{"name":114,"source":91,"cwe_ids":115,"tactics":116,"capec_ids":117,"technique_id":118},"OS Exhaustion Flood",[49],[94],[97],"T1499.001",{"name":120,"source":91,"cwe_ids":121,"tactics":122,"capec_ids":123,"technique_id":127},"Service Exhaustion Flood",[49],[94],[124,97,125,126,98],"CAPEC-469","CAPEC-488","CAPEC-489","T1499.002",{"name":129,"source":91,"cwe_ids":130,"tactics":131,"capec_ids":132,"technique_id":134},"Application Exhaustion Flood",[49],[94],[133],"CAPEC-130","T1499.003",[],{"count":137,"next":138,"previous":6,"results":139},26,"http:\u002F\u002Fweb:8606\u002Fapi\u002Farticles\u002F?page=2&page_size=3&sorted_by=-published_at",[140,148,156],{"id":141,"title":142,"summary":143,"published_at":144,"type":145,"link":146,"image_url":147},30,"PHP2Shell: Two Critical RCE Flaws in PHP (CVSS 9.2)","Unauthenticated code execution demonstrated on WordPress, Drupal and Joomla, and reproduced in our lab. Patched versions and steps to take today.","2026-10-22T00:00:00Z","cve","https:\u002F\u002Fpatrowl.io\u002Fen\u002Fblog\u002Fphp2shell-2-critical-rce-flaws-php-cvss-9-2","https:\u002F\u002Fpatrowl.io\u002Fmedia\u002Fsite\u002Fc0615c4ee6-1792684469\u002Fphp2shell-2-critical-rce-flaws-php-cvss-9-2.png",{"id":149,"title":150,"summary":151,"published_at":152,"type":153,"link":154,"image_url":155},29,"Manage External Security Across All Your Entities","Centralize the management of entities, users and external security resources while maintaining strict data isolation with Patrowl.","2026-09-15T00:00:00Z","security tips","https:\u002F\u002Fpatrowl.io\u002Fen\u002Fblog\u002Fmulti-entity-external-security-how-structure-governance-group-level","https:\u002F\u002Fpatrowl.io\u002Fmedia\u002Fsite\u002F8b2c0cc5eb-1789551467\u002Fvisu_1_multi_tenancy_dark_1x.webp",{"id":157,"title":158,"summary":159,"published_at":160,"type":161,"link":162,"image_url":163},28,"Will AI Become the Next Hacker? Bruce Schneier Answers at DEF CON 34","Tax law, finance, legislation: Bruce Schneier shows how AI could hack human rule systems just as easily as it hacks software.","2026-09-14T00:00:00Z","hacks","https:\u002F\u002Fpatrowl.io\u002Fen\u002Fblog\u002Fbruce-schneier-def-con-34","https:\u002F\u002Fpatrowl.io\u002Fmedia\u002Fsite\u002F5c616d9db4-1789462598\u002Fai-hacker.en.png"]