[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"landing-trending":3,"cve-CVE-2025-38242":30,"landing-articles":78},{"count":4,"next":5,"previous":6,"results":7},266,"http:\u002F\u002Fweb:8606\u002Fapi\u002Ftrending_attacks\u002F?page=2&page_size=3&sorted_by=-published_at",null,[8,17,20],{"id":9,"title":10,"summary":11,"published_at":12,"severity":13,"vendor":14,"products":15},265,"Google Brotli decoder - Remote Code Execution via compressed requests (Exploitation Check)","This control is the second step of the Patrowl response to CVE-2026-111497 (Node2Shell). It complements the first control of 22 October 2026, which focused on the Node.js runtime, and does not replace it.\r\n\r\nWhy a second control\r\n\r\nCVE-2026-111497 is an out-of-bounds write in the Google Brotli decoder, the library that decompresses Brotli (\"br\") data. It was first published as a Node.js vulnerability, because Node.js bundles this decoder. Later publications showed that the flaw is in the library itself. Every product that embeds an affected version of the decoder is concerned, whatever its language or vendor. A public proof of concept demonstrates code execution.\r\n\r\nAny server that decompresses request bodies sent with \"Content-Encoding: br\" exposes the decoder to unauthenticated attackers. Known cases include Express 5 and NestJS 11 on Node.js, Koa and Fastify setups, Bun, Envoy and Istio with request decompression enabled, and any application or reverse proxy that decodes Brotli request bodies with an affected library.\r\n\r\nThe flaw also works in the other direction. A malicious server can compromise an unpatched client that decodes a Brotli response, for example Node.js fetch(), Python clients (requests, httpx, aiohttp, Scrapy) with the Brotli or brotlicffi package, or libcurl builds with Brotli support.\r\n\r\nWhat this control checks\r\n\r\nPatrowl sends small, valid Brotli-compressed requests to each asset and observes whether the server decodes them. The check does not depend on the technology: it detects the behaviour, whatever the stack behind it. These requests are what any legitimate client could send. They never reach the vulnerable code path and cannot affect the availability of the service.\r\n\r\nHow to read the result\r\n\r\nPotentially impacted means the asset decodes Brotli request bodies: the attack surface is exposed. It does not confirm that the asset is vulnerable. The version of the Brotli decoder in use is not visible from the outside.\r\n\r\nThis check covers applications that parse request bodies on their root path. A Not impacted result does not rule out exposure on other routes, nor on the client side. Checking the versions on the servers remains the only exhaustive verification.\r\n\r\nAffected and fixed versions\r\n\r\nGoogle Brotli 1.0.3 to 1.2.0 are affected, fixed in 1.0.10, 1.1.1 and 1.2.1. Fixed releases of the main products embedding it: Node.js 22.23.4, 24.22.1 and 26.12.1 (end-of-life lines 20.x and older and 25.x receive no fix), Bun 1.4.4, Envoy 1.37.8, 1.38.6, 1.39.3 and 1.40.0, Istio 1.29.9, 1.30.6 and 1.31.2, Python Brotli 1.2.1 and brotlicffi 1.2.1.0. Products that link against the system library depend on the Brotli package of the Linux distribution.\r\n\r\nRecommendations\r\n\r\nUpdate every component that embeds the Brotli decoder (only real fix). Start with the assets flagged by this control. Restart the processes after the update. Rebuild containers, single-executable applications and appliances that bundle an affected runtime or library.\r\n\r\nReduce the exposure until the update is deployed. Reject requests with \"Content-Encoding: br\" at the reverse proxy, load balancer or WAF, case-insensitively and including lists such as \"gzip, br\". On Envoy and Istio, disable request decompression for Brotli.\r\n\r\nReview outbound calls. List the features that fetch content from servers you do not control, and patch the services that host them first.","2026-10-24T10:37:22.192753Z",4,"google",[16],"brotli",{"id":4,"title":10,"summary":18,"published_at":12,"severity":13,"vendor":14,"products":19},"This control is the second step of the Patrowl response to CVE-2026-111497 (Node2Shell). It complements the first control of 22 October 2026, which focused on the Node.js runtime, and does not replace it.\r\n\r\nWhy a second control\r\n\r\nCVE-2026-111497 is an out-of-bounds write in the Google Brotli decoder, the library that decompresses Brotli (\"br\") data. It was first published as a Node.js vulnerability, because Node.js bundles this decoder. Later publications showed that the flaw is in the library itself. Every product that embeds an affected version of the decoder is concerned, whatever its language or vendor. A public proof of concept demonstrates code execution.\r\n\r\nAny server that decompresses request bodies sent with \"Content-Encoding: br\" exposes the decoder to unauthenticated attackers. Known cases include Express 5 and NestJS 11 on Node.js, Koa and Fastify setups, Bun, Envoy and Istio with request decompression enabled, and any application or reverse proxy that decodes Brotli request bodies with an affected library.\r\n\r\nThe flaw also works in the other direction. A malicious server can compromise an unpatched client that decodes a Brotli response, for example Node.js fetch(), Python clients (requests, httpx, aiohttp, Scrapy) with the Brotli or brotlicffi package, or libcurl builds with Brotli support.\r\n\r\nWhat this control checks\r\n\r\nPatrowl sends small, valid Brotli-compressed requests to each asset and observes whether the server decodes them. The check does not depend on the technology: it detects the behaviour, whatever the stack behind it. These requests are what any legitimate client could send. They never reach the vulnerable code path and cannot affect the availability of the service.\r\n\r\nHow to read the result\r\n\r\nPotentially impacted means the asset decodes Brotli request bodies: the attack surface is exposed. It does not confirm that the asset is vulnerable. The version of the Brotli decoder in use is not visible from the outside.\r\n\r\nThis check covers applications that parse request bodies on their root path. A Not impacted result does not rule out exposure on other routes, nor on the client side. Checking the versions on the servers remains the only exhaustive verification.\r\n\r\nTwo situations are possible. When the decoding is done by your own application or reverse proxy, identify the component and update it. If an update is not possible right away, reject requests with \"Content-Encoding: br\" at the reverse proxy or WAF.\r\n\r\nWhen the asset is hosted on a managed platform or behind a CDN (for example Platform.sh, Upsun or Fastly), the decoding may be done by the provider's edge router, in front of your application. You cannot patch it yourself, but this router handles all the traffic of your site. Ask your provider to confirm that its edge components are patched against CVE-2026-111497. Assets hosted on a managed platform or behind a CDN carry the tag \"paas: platform.sh\" or \"cdn: fastly\" in the asset view: for these assets, the Brotli decoding is done by the provider's edge router, in front of your application, and only the provider can patch it.\r\n\r\nAffected and fixed versions\r\n\r\nGoogle Brotli 1.0.3 to 1.2.0 are affected, fixed in 1.0.10, 1.1.1 and 1.2.1. Fixed releases of the main products embedding it: Node.js 22.23.4, 24.22.1 and 26.12.1 (end-of-life lines 20.x and older and 25.x receive no fix), Bun 1.4.4, Envoy 1.37.8, 1.38.6, 1.39.3 and 1.40.0, Istio 1.29.9, 1.30.6 and 1.31.2, Python Brotli 1.2.1 and brotlicffi 1.2.1.0. Products that link against the system library depend on the Brotli package of the Linux distribution.\r\n\r\nRecommendations\r\n\r\nUpdate every component that embeds the Brotli decoder (only real fix). Start with the assets flagged by this control. Restart the processes after the update. Rebuild containers, single-executable applications and appliances that bundle an affected runtime or library.\r\n\r\nReduce the exposure until the update is deployed. Reject requests with \"Content-Encoding: br\" at the reverse proxy, load balancer or WAF, case-insensitively and including lists such as \"gzip, br\". On Envoy and Istio, disable request decompression for Brotli.\r\n\r\nContact your edge provider about the status of the pathing (Fastly \u002F Plateform.sh)\r\n\r\nReview outbound calls. List the features that fetch content from servers you do not control, and patch the services that host them first.",[16],{"id":21,"title":22,"summary":23,"published_at":24,"severity":13,"vendor":25,"products":26},263,"Oracle Java SE JSSE - Improper Access Control & Unauthorized Data Access & Unauthorized Data Modification","Oracle Java SE is the Java runtime and development platform. Its JSSE (Java Secure Socket Extension) component provides TLS\u002FSSL for secure network communication. Oracle GraalVM is a JDK distribution based on the same platform.\r\n\r\nCVE-2026-91403\r\n\r\nA vulnerability in the JSSE component of Oracle Java SE, Oracle GraalVM for JDK and Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition can be exploited by an unauthenticated attacker with network access over multiple protocols. A successful attack can give unauthorized access to critical data and allow unauthorized creation, deletion or modification of data. It can also affect sandboxed Java Web Start applications and applets that run untrusted code. The record lists the weakness as CWE-284 (Improper Access Control) in the CISA ADP entry, while another database lists CWE-295. The record lists these affected versions:\r\n- Oracle Java SE: 8u511, 8u511-perf, 11.0.33, 17.0.21, 21.0.13, 25.0.5, 27.0.1.\r\n- Oracle GraalVM for JDK: 17.0.21, 21.0.13.\r\n- Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition: 21.3.20.\r\n\r\nOracle published an out-of-cycle Security Alert on October 21, 2026. One secondary source says the fix makes Java distrust eight compromised intermediate CA certificates shipped with the JDK. The Oracle-focused sources do not confirm this root cause, so check it against the Oracle advisory. CISA ADP SSVC data shows Exploitation: none, Automatable: yes, Technical Impact: total. The CVE is not in the CISA KEV catalog as of October 22, 2026, and its EPSS score is below 1%.","2026-10-23T14:12:32.871954Z","Oracle",[27,28,29],"Oracle Java SE","Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition","Oracle GraalVM for JDK",{"id":31,"cve_id":32,"euvd_id":33,"summary":34,"published":35,"cvss_data":36,"is_remote":47,"cwes":48,"cpes":50,"technologies":55,"references":57,"score":61,"epss_score":62,"epss_percentile":63,"is_kev":47,"cisa_kev_date_added":6,"cisa_kev_due_date":6,"cisa_ssvc":64,"attack_mappings":70,"exploits":77},87120,"CVE-2025-38242","EUVD-2025-20819","In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nmm: userfaultfd: fix race of userfaultfd_move and swap cache\n\nThis commit fixes two kinds of races, they may have different results:\n\nBarry reported a BUG_ON in commit c50f8e6053b0, we may see the same\nBUG_ON if the filemap lookup returned NULL and folio is added to swap\ncache after that.\n\nIf another kind of race is triggered (folio changed after lookup) we\nmay see RSS counter is corrupted:\n\n[  406.893936] BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:ffff0000c5a9ddc0\ntype:MM_ANONPAGES val:-1\n[  406.894071] BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:ffff0000c5a9ddc0\ntype:MM_SHMEMPAGES val:1\n\nBecause the folio is being accounted to the wrong VMA.\n\nI'm not sure if there will be any data corruption though, seems no. \nThe issues above are critical already.\n\n\nOn seeing a swap entry PTE, userfaultfd_move does a lockless swap cache\nlookup, and tries to move the found folio to the faulting vma.  Currently,\nit relies on checking the PTE value to ensure that the moved folio still\nbelongs to the src swap entry and that no new folio has been added to the\nswap cache, which turns out to be unreliable.\n\nWhile working and reviewing the swap table series with Barry, following\nexisting races are observed and reproduced [1]:\n\nIn the example below, move_pages_pte is moving src_pte to dst_pte, where\nsrc_pte is a swap entry PTE holding swap entry S1, and S1 is not in the\nswap cache:\n\nCPU1                               CPU2\nuserfaultfd_move\n  move_pages_pte()\n    entry = pte_to_swp_entry(orig_src_pte);\n    \u002F\u002F Here it got entry = S1\n    ... \u003C interrupted> ...\n                                   \u003Cswapin src_pte, alloc and use folio A>\n                                   \u002F\u002F folio A is a new allocated folio\n                                   \u002F\u002F and get installed into src_pte\n                                   \u003Cfrees swap entry S1>\n                                   \u002F\u002F src_pte now points to folio A, S1\n                                   \u002F\u002F has swap count == 0, it can be freed\n                                   \u002F\u002F by folio_swap_swap or swap\n                                   \u002F\u002F allocator's reclaim.\n                                   \u003Ctry to swap out another folio B>\n                                   \u002F\u002F folio B is a folio in another VMA.\n                                   \u003Cput folio B to swap cache using S1 >\n                                   \u002F\u002F S1 is freed, folio B can use it\n                                   \u002F\u002F for swap out with no problem.\n                                   ...\n    folio = filemap_get_folio(S1)\n    \u002F\u002F Got folio B here !!!\n    ... \u003C interrupted again> ...\n                                   \u003Cswapin folio B and free S1>\n                                   \u002F\u002F Now S1 is free to be used again.\n                                   \u003Cswapout src_pte & folio A using S1>\n                                   \u002F\u002F Now src_pte is a swap entry PTE\n                                   \u002F\u002F holding S1 again.\n    folio_trylock(folio)\n    move_swap_pte\n      double_pt_lock\n      is_pte_pages_stable\n      \u002F\u002F Check passed because src_pte == S1\n      folio_move_anon_rmap(...)\n      \u002F\u002F Moved invalid folio B here !!!\n\nThe race window is very short and requires multiple collisions of multiple\nrare events, so it's very unlikely to happen, but with a deliberately\nconstructed reproducer and increased time window, it can be reproduced\neasily.\n\nThis can be fixed by checking if the folio returned by filemap is the\nvalid swap cache folio after acquiring the folio lock.\n\nAnother similar race is possible: filemap_get_folio may return NULL, but\nfolio (A) could be swapped in and then swapped out again using the same\nswap entry after the lookup.  In such a case, folio (A) may remain in the\nswap cache, so it must be moved too:\n\nCPU1                               CPU2\nuserfaultfd_move\n  move_pages_pte()\n    entry = pte_to_swp_entry(orig_src_pte);\n    \u002F\u002F Here it got entry = S1, and S1 is not in swap cache\n    folio = filemap_get\n---truncated---","2025-07-09T11:15:00Z",{"cvss_v3.1":37},{"scope":38,"version":39,"baseScore":40,"attackVector":41,"baseSeverity":42,"vectorString":43,"integrityImpact":44,"userInteraction":44,"attackComplexity":45,"availabilityImpact":45,"privilegesRequired":46,"confidentialityImpact":44},"UNCHANGED","3.1",4.7,"LOCAL","MEDIUM","CVSS:3.1\u002FAV:L\u002FAC:H\u002FPR:L\u002FUI:N\u002FS:U\u002FC:N\u002FI:N\u002FA:H","NONE","HIGH","LOW",false,[49],"CWE-362",[51,52,53,54],"cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*","cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.16:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:*","cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.16:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:*","cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.16:rc3:*:*:*:*:*:*",[56],"Linux Linux Kernel",[58,59,60],"https:\u002F\u002Fgit.kernel.org\u002Fstable\u002Fc\u002F0ea148a799198518d8ebab63ddd0bb6114a103bc","https:\u002F\u002Fgit.kernel.org\u002Fstable\u002Fc\u002F4c443046d8c9ed8724a4f4c3c2457d3ac8814b2f","https:\u002F\u002Fgit.kernel.org\u002Fstable\u002Fc\u002Fdb2ca8074955ca64187a4fb596dd290b9c446cd3",0.24,0.00134,0.02867,{"timestamp":6,"automatable":65,"tech_impact":66,"exploitation":67,"cisa_decision":68,"cisa_remediation_timeline":69},"no","partial","none",{},"FSU",[71],{"name":72,"source":73,"tactics":74,"technique_id":76},"Exploitation for Privilege Escalation","attack_vector",[75],"privilege-escalation","T1068",[],{"count":79,"next":80,"previous":6,"results":81},26,"http:\u002F\u002Fweb:8606\u002Fapi\u002Farticles\u002F?page=2&page_size=3&sorted_by=-published_at",[82,90,98],{"id":83,"title":84,"summary":85,"published_at":86,"type":87,"link":88,"image_url":89},30,"PHP2Shell: Two Critical RCE Flaws in PHP (CVSS 9.2)","Unauthenticated code execution demonstrated on WordPress, Drupal and Joomla, and reproduced in our lab. Patched versions and steps to take today.","2026-10-22T00:00:00Z","cve","https:\u002F\u002Fpatrowl.io\u002Fen\u002Fblog\u002Fphp2shell-2-critical-rce-flaws-php-cvss-9-2","https:\u002F\u002Fpatrowl.io\u002Fmedia\u002Fsite\u002Fc0615c4ee6-1792684469\u002Fphp2shell-2-critical-rce-flaws-php-cvss-9-2.png",{"id":91,"title":92,"summary":93,"published_at":94,"type":95,"link":96,"image_url":97},29,"Manage External Security Across All Your Entities","Centralize the management of entities, users and external security resources while maintaining strict data isolation with Patrowl.","2026-09-15T00:00:00Z","security tips","https:\u002F\u002Fpatrowl.io\u002Fen\u002Fblog\u002Fmulti-entity-external-security-how-structure-governance-group-level","https:\u002F\u002Fpatrowl.io\u002Fmedia\u002Fsite\u002F8b2c0cc5eb-1789551467\u002Fvisu_1_multi_tenancy_dark_1x.webp",{"id":99,"title":100,"summary":101,"published_at":102,"type":103,"link":104,"image_url":105},28,"Will AI Become the Next Hacker? Bruce Schneier Answers at DEF CON 34","Tax law, finance, legislation: Bruce Schneier shows how AI could hack human rule systems just as easily as it hacks software.","2026-09-14T00:00:00Z","hacks","https:\u002F\u002Fpatrowl.io\u002Fen\u002Fblog\u002Fbruce-schneier-def-con-34","https:\u002F\u002Fpatrowl.io\u002Fmedia\u002Fsite\u002F5c616d9db4-1789462598\u002Fai-hacker.en.png"]