New MCP server — Bring vulnerability intelligence into your AI
Back to feed

CVE-2025-62519

ExploitedNVDCIRCLENISA

EUVD-2025-197804 · Published Nov 17, 2025

phpMyFAQ has Authenticated SQL Injection in Configuration Update Functionality

Summary

An authenticated SQL injection vulnerability in the main configuration update functionality of phpMyFAQ (v4.0.13 and prior) allows a privileged user with 'Configuration Edit' permissions to execute arbitrary SQL commands. Successful exploitation can lead to a full compromise of the database, including reading, modifying, or deleting all data, as well as potential remote code execution depending on the database configuration.

Details

The vulnerability exists in the save method within the src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/ConfigurationTabController.php controller. This method handles the saving of application-wide configuration settings. It retrieves all submitted form data as an associative array via $request->get('edit').

The core of the issue is that while the values of this array are processed, the keys are trusted implicitly and are not sanitized or validated.

File: src/phpMyFAQ/Controller/Administration/ConfigurationTabController.php

// ...
public function save(Request $request): JsonResponse
{
    $this->userHasPermission(PermissionType::CONFIGURATION_EDIT);

    $configurationData = $request->get('edit');
    // ...
    
    foreach ($configurationData as $key => $value) {
        // The key from the user input is used to build the $newConfigValues array.
        $newConfigValues[$key] = (string) $value;
        // ...
    }

    // ...
    // The array, containing user-controlled keys, is passed to the model.
    $this->configuration->update($newConfigValues);

    return $this->json(['success' => Translation::get('ad_config_saved')], Response::HTTP_OK);
}

The $newConfigValues array, which contains user-controlled keys, is then passed to the update method in the src/phpMyFAQ/Configuration.php model. Here, the key ($name) is directly concatenated into a raw SQL query string.

File: src/phpMyFAQ/Configuration.php

public function update(array $newConfigs): bool
{
    // ...
    foreach ($newConfigs as $name => $value) {
        if ($name != 'main.phpMyFAQToken' && !in_array($name, $runtimeConfigs)) {
            // VULNERABLE CODE: The array key '$name' is not escaped and is directly
            // concatenated into the SQL query string. The value is escaped, but not the name.
            $update = sprintf(
                "UPDATE %s%s SET config_value = '%s' WHERE config_name = '%s'",
                Database::getTablePrefix(),
                $this->tableName,
                $this->getDb()->escape(trim($value)),
                $name
            );

            $this->getDb()->query($update);
            // ...
        }
    }

    return true;
}

An attacker can craft a malicious form parameter name (which becomes the array key) to break out of the single quotes in the WHERE clause and inject arbitrary SQL commands.

PoC (Proof of Concept)

Prerequisites:

  1. A running instance of phpMyFAQ (v4.0.13 confirmed vulnerable).
  2. An authenticated user session with permissions to edit the configuration.

Execution:
Due to the application's CSRF protection, the easiest way to reproduce this is by capturing a legitimate request to save the configuration and modifying it using a proxy tool like Burp Suite's Repeater.

  1. Log in as an administrator and navigate to Administration -> Configuration.
  2. Make a trivial change (e.g., toggle a setting) and click "Save configuration". Capture this POST request to /admin/api/configuration.
  3. Send the captured request to Repeater. The request will contain a valid Cookie header and a pmf-csrf-token parameter.
  4. Modify the request body to inject a malicious key. Add a new multipart/form-data part with a crafted name attribute.

Example Malicious Request Body Part (Error-Based):

------WebKitFormBoundaryRandomString
Content-Disposition: form-data; name="edit[dummykey' and updatexml(1, concat(0x7e, (SELECT table_name FROM information_schema.tables WHERE table_schema = database() LIMIT 0, 1), 0x7e), 1) and '1]"

true
------WebKitFormBoundaryRandomString

Note: You must also include the pmf-csrf-token part from the original request in the body.

Result:
The server will respond with a 500 Internal Server Error, and the body of the response will contain a database error message, confirming the SQL injection. The leaked data will be present within the error string.

An error occurred: XPATH syntax error: '~faq_faqadminlog~' at line 311 at /var/www/html/src/phpMyFAQ/Database/Mysqli.php

This error confirms the successful execution of the injected updatexml payload, which has extracted and revealed the name of the first table in the database (faq_faqadminlog). Time-based blind techniques can also be used to extract data without relying on error messages.

Technologies

Phpmyfaq PhpmyfaqThorsten Phpmyfaq

Weaknesses

CWE-89

CVSS scores

  • v3.17.2CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

MITRE ATT&CK

Inferred

Where this vulnerability fits in an attack

Initial Access

References

Potentially impacted assets

See if this affects your attack surface

Latest trending attack

Criticalyesterday

Google Brotli decoder - Remote Code Execution via compressed requests (Exploitation Check)

This control is the second step of the Patrowl response to CVE-2026-111497 (Node2Shell). It complements the first control of 22 October 2026, which focused on the Node.js runtime, and does not replace it. Why a second control CVE-2026-111497 is an out-of-bounds write in the Google Brotli decoder, the library that decompresses Brotli ("br") data. It was first published as a Node.js vulnerability, because Node.js bundles this decoder. Later publications showed that the flaw is in the library itself. Every product that embeds an affected version of the decoder is concerned, whatever its language or vendor. A public proof of concept demonstrates code execution. Any server that decompresses request bodies sent with "Content-Encoding: br" exposes the decoder to unauthenticated attackers. Known cases include Express 5 and NestJS 11 on Node.js, Koa and Fastify setups, Bun, Envoy and Istio with request decompression enabled, and any application or reverse proxy that decodes Brotli request bodies with an affected library. The flaw also works in the other direction. A malicious server can compromise an unpatched client that decodes a Brotli response, for example Node.js fetch(), Python clients (requests, httpx, aiohttp, Scrapy) with the Brotli or brotlicffi package, or libcurl builds with Brotli support. What this control checks Patrowl sends small, valid Brotli-compressed requests to each asset and observes whether the server decodes them. The check does not depend on the technology: it detects the behaviour, whatever the stack behind it. These requests are what any legitimate client could send. They never reach the vulnerable code path and cannot affect the availability of the service. How to read the result Potentially impacted means the asset decodes Brotli request bodies: the attack surface is exposed. It does not confirm that the asset is vulnerable. The version of the Brotli decoder in use is not visible from the outside. This check covers applications that parse request bodies on their root path. A Not impacted result does not rule out exposure on other routes, nor on the client side. Checking the versions on the servers remains the only exhaustive verification. Affected and fixed versions Google Brotli 1.0.3 to 1.2.0 are affected, fixed in 1.0.10, 1.1.1 and 1.2.1. Fixed releases of the main products embedding it: Node.js 22.23.4, 24.22.1 and 26.12.1 (end-of-life lines 20.x and older and 25.x receive no fix), Bun 1.4.4, Envoy 1.37.8, 1.38.6, 1.39.3 and 1.40.0, Istio 1.29.9, 1.30.6 and 1.31.2, Python Brotli 1.2.1 and brotlicffi 1.2.1.0. Products that link against the system library depend on the Brotli package of the Linux distribution. Recommendations Update every component that embeds the Brotli decoder (only real fix). Start with the assets flagged by this control. Restart the processes after the update. Rebuild containers, single-executable applications and appliances that bundle an affected runtime or library. Reduce the exposure until the update is deployed. Reject requests with "Content-Encoding: br" at the reverse proxy, load balancer or WAF, case-insensitively and including lists such as "gzip, br". On Envoy and Istio, disable request decompression for Brotli. Review outbound calls. List the features that fetch content from servers you do not control, and patch the services that host them first.

Take 15 minutes to discover our platform with our experts

Patrowl Intel platform screenshot