New MCP server — Bring vulnerability intelligence into your AI
Back to feed

CVE-2025-64747

ExploitedNVDCIRCLENISA

EUVD-2025-177203 · Published Nov 14, 2025

Directus is Vulnerable to Stored Cross-site Scripting

Summary

A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists that allows users with upload files and edit item permissions to inject malicious JavaScript through the Block Editor interface. Attackers can bypass Content Security Policy (CSP) restrictions by combining file uploads with iframe srcdoc attributes, resulting in persistent XSS execution.

Details

The vulnerability arises from insufficient sanitization in the Block Editor interface when processing JSON content containing HTML elements. The attack requires two permissions:

  • upload files - To upload malicious JavaScript files
  • edit item - To create or modify content with the Block Editor

Attack Vector:

  1. JavaScript File Upload: Attackers upload a malicious JavaScript file via the files endpoint, obtaining a file ID accessible through the assets directory

  2. Block Editor Exploitation: Using a JSON field with Block Editor interface, attackers inject raw HTML containing an iframe with srcdoc attribute that references the uploaded file

  3. CSP Bypass: The iframe srcdoc technique circumvents existing CSP protections by creating a new document context that loads the uploaded script

The payload is injected through direct API manipulation (PATCH request) to bypass client-side validation, targeting the Block Editor's paragraph data structure within the JSON content field.

Impact

This vulnerability enables:

  • Persistent XSS - Malicious scripts execute whenever affected content is viewed
  • Session hijacking - Access to authentication tokens and cookies of users viewing the content
  • Administrative compromise - If administrators view infected content, their elevated privileges can be exploited
  • CSP bypass - Demonstrates ineffective security controls, potentially affecting other protections
  • Data exfiltration - Ability to steal sensitive information displayed in the application
  • Phishing attacks - Injection of convincing fake login forms or malicious redirects

Technologies

Monospace DirectusDirectus Directus

Weaknesses

CWE-79CWE-20

CVSS scores

  • v3.15.5CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

MITRE ATT&CK

Inferred

Where this vulnerability fits in an attack

Initial Access

References

Potentially impacted assets

See if this affects your attack surface

Latest trending attack

Criticalyesterday

Google Brotli decoder - Remote Code Execution via compressed requests (Exploitation Check)

This control is the second step of the Patrowl response to CVE-2026-111497 (Node2Shell). It complements the first control of 22 October 2026, which focused on the Node.js runtime, and does not replace it. Why a second control CVE-2026-111497 is an out-of-bounds write in the Google Brotli decoder, the library that decompresses Brotli ("br") data. It was first published as a Node.js vulnerability, because Node.js bundles this decoder. Later publications showed that the flaw is in the library itself. Every product that embeds an affected version of the decoder is concerned, whatever its language or vendor. A public proof of concept demonstrates code execution. Any server that decompresses request bodies sent with "Content-Encoding: br" exposes the decoder to unauthenticated attackers. Known cases include Express 5 and NestJS 11 on Node.js, Koa and Fastify setups, Bun, Envoy and Istio with request decompression enabled, and any application or reverse proxy that decodes Brotli request bodies with an affected library. The flaw also works in the other direction. A malicious server can compromise an unpatched client that decodes a Brotli response, for example Node.js fetch(), Python clients (requests, httpx, aiohttp, Scrapy) with the Brotli or brotlicffi package, or libcurl builds with Brotli support. What this control checks Patrowl sends small, valid Brotli-compressed requests to each asset and observes whether the server decodes them. The check does not depend on the technology: it detects the behaviour, whatever the stack behind it. These requests are what any legitimate client could send. They never reach the vulnerable code path and cannot affect the availability of the service. How to read the result Potentially impacted means the asset decodes Brotli request bodies: the attack surface is exposed. It does not confirm that the asset is vulnerable. The version of the Brotli decoder in use is not visible from the outside. This check covers applications that parse request bodies on their root path. A Not impacted result does not rule out exposure on other routes, nor on the client side. Checking the versions on the servers remains the only exhaustive verification. Affected and fixed versions Google Brotli 1.0.3 to 1.2.0 are affected, fixed in 1.0.10, 1.1.1 and 1.2.1. Fixed releases of the main products embedding it: Node.js 22.23.4, 24.22.1 and 26.12.1 (end-of-life lines 20.x and older and 25.x receive no fix), Bun 1.4.4, Envoy 1.37.8, 1.38.6, 1.39.3 and 1.40.0, Istio 1.29.9, 1.30.6 and 1.31.2, Python Brotli 1.2.1 and brotlicffi 1.2.1.0. Products that link against the system library depend on the Brotli package of the Linux distribution. Recommendations Update every component that embeds the Brotli decoder (only real fix). Start with the assets flagged by this control. Restart the processes after the update. Rebuild containers, single-executable applications and appliances that bundle an affected runtime or library. Reduce the exposure until the update is deployed. Reject requests with "Content-Encoding: br" at the reverse proxy, load balancer or WAF, case-insensitively and including lists such as "gzip, br". On Envoy and Istio, disable request decompression for Brotli. Review outbound calls. List the features that fetch content from servers you do not control, and patch the services that host them first.

Take 15 minutes to discover our platform with our experts

Patrowl Intel platform screenshot