New MCP server — Bring vulnerability intelligence into your AI
Back to feed

CVE-2025-66307

ExploitedNVDCIRCLENISA

EUVD-2025-200103 · Published Dec 2, 2025

Grav Admin Plugin vulnerable to User Enumeration & Email Disclosure

Grav v1.7.49.5 / Admin v1.10.49.1 – User Enumeration & Email Disclosure

Summary

A user enumeration and email disclosure vulnerability exists in Grav v1.7.49.5 with Admin plugin v1.10.49.1.
The "Forgot Password" functionality at /admin/forgot leaks information about valid usernames and their associated email addresses through distinct server responses.
This allows an attacker to enumerate users and disclose sensitive email addresses, which can be leveraged for targeted attacks such as password spraying, phishing, or social engineering.

Details

The issue resides in the taskForgot() function, which handles the forgot password workflow.
Relevant vulnerable logic:

if (null === $user || $user->state !== 'enabled' || !$to) {
    ...
    // Generic message for invalid/non-existing users
    $this->setMessage($this->translate('PLUGIN_ADMIN.FORGOT_INSTRUCTIONS_SENT_VIA_EMAIL'));
    return $this->createRedirectResponse($current);
}

if ($rateLimiter->isRateLimited($username)) {
    ...
    $interval = $config->get('plugins.login.max_pw_resets_interval', 2);

    // Sensitive message for valid users
    $this->setMessage($this->translate('PLUGIN_LOGIN.FORGOT_CANNOT_RESET_IT_IS_BLOCKED', $to, $interval), 'error');

    return $this->createRedirectResponse($current);
}

When an attacker submits the password reset form at /admin/forgot with an invalid username, the application responds with:

Instructions to reset your password have been sent to your email address

However, when a valid username is supplied, and the attacker repeatedly triggers password reset requests, the application responds with:

Cannot reset password for <USER_EMAIL>, password reset functionality temporarily blocked, please try later (maximum 60 minutes)

This discrepancy in responses enables:

  1. User Enumeration – Attackers can determine if a username exists in the system by analyzing the response.
  2. User Email Disclosure – The system discloses the actual email address associated with the account (e.g., admin@localhost.test).

This violates best practices for authentication flows, where responses should remain generic to avoid leaking sensitive information.

PoC
  1. Navigate to the Forgot Password page: https://<target>/admin/forgot
  2. Submit a reset request with a random/invalid username (e.g., invalid_user):
  • Response:
    Instructions to reset your password have been sent to your email address
    
  1. Submit a reset request with a valid username (e.g., admin).
  2. Repeatedly request a reset for the same username until the lockout mechanism triggers.
  • Response:
    Cannot reset password for admin@localhost.test, password reset functionality temporarily blocked, please try later (maximum 60 minutes)
    
  1. Observe the leaked email address of the admin account in the error message.
Impact
  • Severity: Medium
  • Type: Information Disclosure / User Enumeration
  • Who is Impacted: All Grav sites using Admin plugin v1.10.49.1 with password reset enabled.
  • Risks:
    • Allows attackers to enumerate valid usernames.
    • Exposes email addresses of admin accounts, which can be used in:
    • Credential stuffing
    • Password spraying
    • Phishing/social engineering campaigns
    • Further exploitation in combination with other vulnerabilities
Recommendation
  • Modify the taskForgot() logic to always return a generic, non-identifying message, regardless of whether the username exists or rate limits are hit.

  • Example safe response:

    If the account exists, password reset instructions will be sent.
    
  • Do not include email addresses ($to) or other sensitive data in error messages.

Technologies

Getgrav Grav-Plugin-AdminGetgrav Grav

Weaknesses

CWE-204

CVSS scores

  • v3.16.5CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L

MITRE ATT&CK

Inferred

Where this vulnerability fits in an attack

Reconnaissance Initial Access Discovery

References

Potentially impacted assets

See if this affects your attack surface

Latest trending attack

Criticalyesterday

Google Brotli decoder - Remote Code Execution via compressed requests (Exploitation Check)

This control is the second step of the Patrowl response to CVE-2026-111497 (Node2Shell). It complements the first control of 22 October 2026, which focused on the Node.js runtime, and does not replace it. Why a second control CVE-2026-111497 is an out-of-bounds write in the Google Brotli decoder, the library that decompresses Brotli ("br") data. It was first published as a Node.js vulnerability, because Node.js bundles this decoder. Later publications showed that the flaw is in the library itself. Every product that embeds an affected version of the decoder is concerned, whatever its language or vendor. A public proof of concept demonstrates code execution. Any server that decompresses request bodies sent with "Content-Encoding: br" exposes the decoder to unauthenticated attackers. Known cases include Express 5 and NestJS 11 on Node.js, Koa and Fastify setups, Bun, Envoy and Istio with request decompression enabled, and any application or reverse proxy that decodes Brotli request bodies with an affected library. The flaw also works in the other direction. A malicious server can compromise an unpatched client that decodes a Brotli response, for example Node.js fetch(), Python clients (requests, httpx, aiohttp, Scrapy) with the Brotli or brotlicffi package, or libcurl builds with Brotli support. What this control checks Patrowl sends small, valid Brotli-compressed requests to each asset and observes whether the server decodes them. The check does not depend on the technology: it detects the behaviour, whatever the stack behind it. These requests are what any legitimate client could send. They never reach the vulnerable code path and cannot affect the availability of the service. How to read the result Potentially impacted means the asset decodes Brotli request bodies: the attack surface is exposed. It does not confirm that the asset is vulnerable. The version of the Brotli decoder in use is not visible from the outside. This check covers applications that parse request bodies on their root path. A Not impacted result does not rule out exposure on other routes, nor on the client side. Checking the versions on the servers remains the only exhaustive verification. Affected and fixed versions Google Brotli 1.0.3 to 1.2.0 are affected, fixed in 1.0.10, 1.1.1 and 1.2.1. Fixed releases of the main products embedding it: Node.js 22.23.4, 24.22.1 and 26.12.1 (end-of-life lines 20.x and older and 25.x receive no fix), Bun 1.4.4, Envoy 1.37.8, 1.38.6, 1.39.3 and 1.40.0, Istio 1.29.9, 1.30.6 and 1.31.2, Python Brotli 1.2.1 and brotlicffi 1.2.1.0. Products that link against the system library depend on the Brotli package of the Linux distribution. Recommendations Update every component that embeds the Brotli decoder (only real fix). Start with the assets flagged by this control. Restart the processes after the update. Rebuild containers, single-executable applications and appliances that bundle an affected runtime or library. Reduce the exposure until the update is deployed. Reject requests with "Content-Encoding: br" at the reverse proxy, load balancer or WAF, case-insensitively and including lists such as "gzip, br". On Envoy and Istio, disable request decompression for Brotli. Review outbound calls. List the features that fetch content from servers you do not control, and patch the services that host them first.

Take 15 minutes to discover our platform with our experts

Patrowl Intel platform screenshot