New MCP server — Bring vulnerability intelligence into your AI
Back to feed

CVE-2025-66565

NVDCIRCLENISA

EUVD-2025-201791 · Published Dec 8, 2025

Fiber Utils UUIDv4 and UUID Silent Fallback to Predictable Values

Summary

Critical security vulnerabilities exist in both the UUIDv4() and UUID() functions of the github.com/gofiber/utils package. When the system's cryptographic random number generator (crypto/rand) fails, both functions silently fall back to returning predictable UUID values, the zero UUID "00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000". This compromises the security of all Fiber applications using these functions for security-critical operations on Go versions prior to 1.24.

Both functions are vulnerable to the same root cause (crypto/rand failure):

  • UUIDv4(): Indirect vulnerability through uuid.NewRandom() → crypto/rand.Read() → fallback to UUID()
  • UUID(): Direct vulnerability through crypto/rand.Read(uuidSeed[:]) → silent zero UUID return

Note: Go 1.24 and later panics on crypto/rand Read() failures, mitigating this vulnerability. Applications running on Go 1.24+ are not affected by the silent fallback behavior.


Vulnerability Details

Affected Functions

  • Package: github.com/gofiber/utils
  • Functions: UUIDv4() and UUID()
  • Return Type: string (both functions)
  • Locations: common.go:93-99 (UUIDv4), common.go:60-89 (UUID)

Technical Description

The vulnerability occurs through two related but distinct failure paths, both ultimately caused by crypto/rand.Read() failures on Go < 1.24:

Primary Path: UUIDv4() Vulnerability

  1. UUIDv4() calls google/uuid.NewRandom() which internally uses crypto/rand.Read()
  2. If uuid.NewRandom() fails, UUIDv4() falls back to the internal UUID() function
  3. No error is returned to the application - silent security failure occurs

Secondary Path: UUID() Vulnerability

  1. UUID() directly calls crypto/rand.Read(uuidSeed[:]) to seed its internal state
  2. If seeding fails, UUID() silently fails and returns the zero UUID "00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000"
  3. Applications receive predictable UUIDs with no indication of the security failure

Code Analysis

UUIDv4() Vulnerability Path

func UUIDv4() string {
	token, err := uuid.NewRandom()  // Uses crypto/rand.Read() internally
	if err != nil {
		return UUID()  // Dangerous fallback - no error returned to application
	}
	return token.String()
}

UUID() Vulnerability Path

func UUID() string {
	uuidSetup.Do(func() {
		if _, err := rand.Read(uuidSeed[:]); err != nil {  // Direct crypto/rand.Read() call
			return  // Silent failure - no seeding, uuidCounter remains 0
		}
		uuidCounter = binary.LittleEndian.Uint64(uuidSeed[:8])
	})
	if atomic.LoadUint64(&uuidCounter) <= 0 {
		return "00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000"  // Zero UUID returned silently
	}
	// ... generate UUID from counter
}

Root Cause: Both vulnerabilities stem from crypto/rand.Read() failures, occurring through different code paths with the same dangerous silent fallback behavior.


Security Impact

Severity: CRITICAL

This issue is especially severe because many Fiber middleware packages (session, CSRF, auth, rate-limit, request-ID, etc.) default to utils.UUIDv4() for generating security-sensitive identifiers. A failure in crypto/rand would cause every generated identifier across the entire application to collapse to a single predictable value (the zero UUID), resulting in:

  • Session fixation / universal session hijack
  • CSRF token predictability and bypass
  • Authentication token replay
  • Global identifier collisions leading to severe application breakage
  • Potential application-wide DoS due to every request using the same “unique” key, causing cache overwrites, session stomping, corrupted internal maps, and loss of isolation across all users

Attack Scenario

While entropy exhaustion is extremely rare on modern Linux systems, RNG access failures (e.g., restricted /dev/random or /dev/urandom access, broken container environments, sandbox restrictions, misconfigured VMs, or FIPS-mode RNG failures) are realistic. In these scenarios on Go < 1.24, crypto/rand may return errors immediately — triggering the vulnerable fallback paths.

On Go 1.24+, crypto/rand Read() panics on failure, mitigating the silent-zero fallback issue.


Proof of Concept

  1. uuid.NewRandom() fails (indirect crypto/rand.Read() failure)
  2. UUIDv4() calls UUID() as fallback with no error returned
  3. UUID() seeding fails directly via crypto/rand.Read(uuidSeed[:])
  4. Zero UUID "00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" is returned silently
  5. No error is propagated to the application from either function

Affected Versions

  • All versions of github.com/gofiber/utils containing the UUIDv4() or UUID() functions
  • Applications using Fiber middleware that depend on UUIDv4() or UUID for security
  • Only applicable to Go < 1.24; Go 1.24+ panics/block on crypto/rand Read() failures and is not affected

Mitigation

Immediate Workaround

Replace usage of utils.UUIDv4() with uuid.New() or wait for fix:

sessionID := uuid.New()

Recommended Fix

Modify utils.UUIDv4() and utils.UUID() to fail explicitly when cryptographic randomness is unavailable:

func UUIDv4() string {
	token, err := uuid.NewRandom()
	if err != nil {
		panic(fmt.Sprintf("utils: failed to generate secure UUID: %v", err))
	}
	return token.String()
}

func UUID() string {
    uuidSetup.Do(func() {
        if _, err := rand.Read(uuidSeed[:]); err != nil {
            panic(fmt.Sprintf("utils: failed to seed UUID generator: %v", err))
        }
        uuidCounter = binary.LittleEndian.Uint64(uuidSeed[:8])
    })
    if atomic.LoadUint64(&uuidCounter) <= 0 {
        panic("utils: UUID generator not properly seeded")
    }
    // ... generate UUID from counter
}

Detection

Applications can detect if they're affected by:

  1. Checking if they use github.com/gofiber/utils
  2. Searching for UUIDv4() and UUID() usage in security-critical code paths
  3. Reviewing Fiber middleware configurations that rely on defaults of UUIDv4() for security identifiers

References


Contact

Reported by: @sixcolors


Classification

  • OWASP: A02:2021 - Cryptographic Failures
  • Impact: Complete compromise of application security model on Go < 1.24
  • Exploitability: Medium (requires entropy failure)
  • Scope: All Fiber applications using affected middleware on Go < 1.24

Technologies

Gofiber Utils

Weaknesses

CWE-338CWE-331CWE-252

References

Potentially impacted assets

See if this affects your attack surface

Latest trending attack

Criticaltoday

Google Brotli decoder - Remote Code Execution via compressed requests (Exploitation Check)

This control is the second step of the Patrowl response to CVE-2026-111497 (Node2Shell). It complements the first control of 22 October 2026, which focused on the Node.js runtime, and does not replace it. Why a second control CVE-2026-111497 is an out-of-bounds write in the Google Brotli decoder, the library that decompresses Brotli ("br") data. It was first published as a Node.js vulnerability, because Node.js bundles this decoder. Later publications showed that the flaw is in the library itself. Every product that embeds an affected version of the decoder is concerned, whatever its language or vendor. A public proof of concept demonstrates code execution. Any server that decompresses request bodies sent with "Content-Encoding: br" exposes the decoder to unauthenticated attackers. Known cases include Express 5 and NestJS 11 on Node.js, Koa and Fastify setups, Bun, Envoy and Istio with request decompression enabled, and any application or reverse proxy that decodes Brotli request bodies with an affected library. The flaw also works in the other direction. A malicious server can compromise an unpatched client that decodes a Brotli response, for example Node.js fetch(), Python clients (requests, httpx, aiohttp, Scrapy) with the Brotli or brotlicffi package, or libcurl builds with Brotli support. What this control checks Patrowl sends small, valid Brotli-compressed requests to each asset and observes whether the server decodes them. The check does not depend on the technology: it detects the behaviour, whatever the stack behind it. These requests are what any legitimate client could send. They never reach the vulnerable code path and cannot affect the availability of the service. How to read the result Potentially impacted means the asset decodes Brotli request bodies: the attack surface is exposed. It does not confirm that the asset is vulnerable. The version of the Brotli decoder in use is not visible from the outside. This check covers applications that parse request bodies on their root path. A Not impacted result does not rule out exposure on other routes, nor on the client side. Checking the versions on the servers remains the only exhaustive verification. Two situations are possible. When the decoding is done by your own application or reverse proxy, identify the component and update it. If an update is not possible right away, reject requests with "Content-Encoding: br" at the reverse proxy or WAF. When the asset is hosted on a managed platform or behind a CDN (for example Platform.sh, Upsun or Fastly), the decoding may be done by the provider's edge router, in front of your application. You cannot patch it yourself, but this router handles all the traffic of your site. Ask your provider to confirm that its edge components are patched against CVE-2026-111497. Assets hosted on a managed platform or behind a CDN carry the tag "paas: platform.sh" or "cdn: fastly" in the asset view: for these assets, the Brotli decoding is done by the provider's edge router, in front of your application, and only the provider can patch it. Affected and fixed versions Google Brotli 1.0.3 to 1.2.0 are affected, fixed in 1.0.10, 1.1.1 and 1.2.1. Fixed releases of the main products embedding it: Node.js 22.23.4, 24.22.1 and 26.12.1 (end-of-life lines 20.x and older and 25.x receive no fix), Bun 1.4.4, Envoy 1.37.8, 1.38.6, 1.39.3 and 1.40.0, Istio 1.29.9, 1.30.6 and 1.31.2, Python Brotli 1.2.1 and brotlicffi 1.2.1.0. Products that link against the system library depend on the Brotli package of the Linux distribution. Recommendations Update every component that embeds the Brotli decoder (only real fix). Start with the assets flagged by this control. Restart the processes after the update. Rebuild containers, single-executable applications and appliances that bundle an affected runtime or library. Reduce the exposure until the update is deployed. Reject requests with "Content-Encoding: br" at the reverse proxy, load balancer or WAF, case-insensitively and including lists such as "gzip, br". On Envoy and Istio, disable request decompression for Brotli. Contact your edge provider about the status of the pathing (Fastly / Plateform.sh) Review outbound calls. List the features that fetch content from servers you do not control, and patch the services that host them first.

Take 15 minutes to discover our platform with our experts

PatrowlIntel platform screenshot