New MCP server — Bring vulnerability intelligence into your AI
Back to feed

CVE-2026-32755

ExploitedNVDCIRCLENISA

EUVD-2026-13384 · Published Mar 16, 2026

Admidio is Missing CSRF Protection on Role Membership Date Changes

Summary

The save_membership action in modules/profile/profile_function.php saves changes to a member's role membership start and end dates but does not validate the CSRF token. The handler checks stop_membership and remove_former_membership against the CSRF token but omits save_membership from that check. Because membership UUIDs appear in the HTML source visible to authenticated users, an attacker can embed a crafted POST form on any external page and trick a role leader into submitting it, silently altering membership dates for any member of roles the victim leads.

Details

CSRF Check Is Absent for save_membership

File: D:/bugcrowd/admidio/repo/modules/profile/profile_function.php, lines 40-42

The CSRF guard covers only two of the three mutative modes:

if (in_array($getMode, array('stop_membership', 'remove_former_membership'))) {
    // check the CSRF token of the form against the session token
    SecurityUtils::validateCsrfToken($_POST['adm_csrf_token']);
}

The save_membership mode is missing from this array. The handler then proceeds to read dates from $_POST and update the database without any token verification:

} elseif ($getMode === 'save_membership') {
    $postMembershipStart = admFuncVariableIsValid($_POST, 'adm_membership_start_date', 'date', array('requireValue' => true));
    $postMembershipEnd   = admFuncVariableIsValid($_POST, 'adm_membership_end_date',   'date', array('requireValue' => true));

    $member = new Membership($gDb);
    $member->readDataByUuid($getMemberUuid);
    $role = new Role($gDb, (int)$member->getValue('mem_rol_id'));

    // check if user has the right to edit this membership
    if (!$role->allowedToAssignMembers($gCurrentUser)) {
        throw new Exception('SYS_NO_RIGHTS');
    }
    // ... validates dates ...
    $role->setMembership($user->getValue('usr_id'), $postMembershipStart, $postMembershipEnd, ...);
    echo 'success';
}

File: D:/bugcrowd/admidio/repo/modules/profile/profile_function.php, lines 131-169

The Form Does Generate a CSRF Token (Not Validated)

File: D:/bugcrowd/admidio/repo/modules/profile/roles_functions.php, lines 218-241

The membership date form is created via FormPresenter, which automatically injects an adm_csrf_token hidden field into every form. However, the server-side save_membership handler never retrieves or validates this token. An attacker's forged form does not need to include the token at all, since the server does not check it.

Who Can Be Exploited as the CSRF Victim

File: D:/bugcrowd/admidio/repo/src/Roles/Entity/Role.php, lines 98-121

The allowedToAssignMembers() check grants write access to:

  • Any user who is isAdministratorRoles() (role administrators), or
  • Any user who is a leader of the target role when the role has rol_leader_rights set to ROLE_LEADER_MEMBERS_ASSIGN or ROLE_LEADER_MEMBERS_ASSIGN_EDIT

Role leaders are not system administrators. They are regular members who have been designated as group leaders (e.g., a sports team captain or committee chair). This represents a low-privilege attack surface.

UUIDs Are Discoverable from HTML Source

The save URL for the membership date form is embedded in the profile page HTML:

/adm_program/modules/profile/profile_function.php?mode=save_membership&user_uuid=<UUID>&member_uuid=<UUID>

Any authenticated member who can view a profile page can extract both UUIDs from the page source.

PoC

The attacker hosts the following HTML page and tricks a role leader into visiting it while logged in to Admidio:

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<body onload="document.getElementById('csrf_form').submit()">
  <form id="csrf_form"
        method="POST"
        action="https://TARGET/adm_program/modules/profile/profile_function.php?mode=save_membership&user_uuid=<VICTIM_USER_UUID>&member_uuid=<MEMBERSHIP_UUID>">
    <input type="hidden" name="adm_membership_start_date" value="2000-01-01">
    <input type="hidden" name="adm_membership_end_date"   value="2000-01-02">
  </form>
</body>
</html>

Expected result: The target member's role membership dates are overwritten to 2000-01-01 through 2000-01-02, effectively terminating their active membership immediately (end date is in the past).

Note: No adm_csrf_token field is required because the server does not validate it for save_membership.

Impact

  • Unauthorized membership date manipulation: A role leader's session can be silently exploited to change start and end dates for any member of roles they lead. Setting the end date to a past date immediately terminates the member's active participation.
  • Effective access revocation: Membership in roles controls access to role-restricted features (events visible only to role members, document folders with upload rights, and mailing list memberships). Revoking membership via CSRF removes these access rights.
  • Covert escalation: An attacker could also extend a restricted membership period beyond its authorized end date, maintaining access for a user who should have been deactivated.
  • No administrative approval required: The impact occurs silently on the victim's session with no confirmation dialog or notification email.

Recommended Fix

Fix 1: Add save_membership to the existing CSRF validation check
// File: modules/profile/profile_function.php, lines 40-42
if (in_array($getMode, array('stop_membership', 'remove_former_membership', 'save_membership'))) {
    // check the CSRF token of the form against the session token
    SecurityUtils::validateCsrfToken($_POST['adm_csrf_token']);
}
Fix 2: Use the form-object validation pattern (consistent with other write endpoints)
} elseif ($getMode === 'save_membership') {
    // Validate CSRF via form object (consistent pattern used by DocumentsService, etc.)
    $membershipForm = $gCurrentSession->getFormObject($_POST['adm_csrf_token']);
    $formValues = $membershipForm->validate($_POST);

    $postMembershipStart = $formValues['adm_membership_start_date'];
    $postMembershipEnd   = $formValues['adm_membership_end_date'];
    // ... rest of save logic unchanged
}

Technologies

Admidio Admidio

Weaknesses

CWE-352

CVSS scores

  • v3.15.7CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

MITRE ATT&CK

Inferred

Where this vulnerability fits in an attack

Initial Access

References

Potentially impacted assets

See if this affects your attack surface

Latest trending attack

Criticalyesterday

Google Brotli decoder - Remote Code Execution via compressed requests (Exploitation Check)

This control is the second step of the Patrowl response to CVE-2026-111497 (Node2Shell). It complements the first control of 22 October 2026, which focused on the Node.js runtime, and does not replace it. Why a second control CVE-2026-111497 is an out-of-bounds write in the Google Brotli decoder, the library that decompresses Brotli ("br") data. It was first published as a Node.js vulnerability, because Node.js bundles this decoder. Later publications showed that the flaw is in the library itself. Every product that embeds an affected version of the decoder is concerned, whatever its language or vendor. A public proof of concept demonstrates code execution. Any server that decompresses request bodies sent with "Content-Encoding: br" exposes the decoder to unauthenticated attackers. Known cases include Express 5 and NestJS 11 on Node.js, Koa and Fastify setups, Bun, Envoy and Istio with request decompression enabled, and any application or reverse proxy that decodes Brotli request bodies with an affected library. The flaw also works in the other direction. A malicious server can compromise an unpatched client that decodes a Brotli response, for example Node.js fetch(), Python clients (requests, httpx, aiohttp, Scrapy) with the Brotli or brotlicffi package, or libcurl builds with Brotli support. What this control checks Patrowl sends small, valid Brotli-compressed requests to each asset and observes whether the server decodes them. The check does not depend on the technology: it detects the behaviour, whatever the stack behind it. These requests are what any legitimate client could send. They never reach the vulnerable code path and cannot affect the availability of the service. How to read the result Potentially impacted means the asset decodes Brotli request bodies: the attack surface is exposed. It does not confirm that the asset is vulnerable. The version of the Brotli decoder in use is not visible from the outside. This check covers applications that parse request bodies on their root path. A Not impacted result does not rule out exposure on other routes, nor on the client side. Checking the versions on the servers remains the only exhaustive verification. Affected and fixed versions Google Brotli 1.0.3 to 1.2.0 are affected, fixed in 1.0.10, 1.1.1 and 1.2.1. Fixed releases of the main products embedding it: Node.js 22.23.4, 24.22.1 and 26.12.1 (end-of-life lines 20.x and older and 25.x receive no fix), Bun 1.4.4, Envoy 1.37.8, 1.38.6, 1.39.3 and 1.40.0, Istio 1.29.9, 1.30.6 and 1.31.2, Python Brotli 1.2.1 and brotlicffi 1.2.1.0. Products that link against the system library depend on the Brotli package of the Linux distribution. Recommendations Update every component that embeds the Brotli decoder (only real fix). Start with the assets flagged by this control. Restart the processes after the update. Rebuild containers, single-executable applications and appliances that bundle an affected runtime or library. Reduce the exposure until the update is deployed. Reject requests with "Content-Encoding: br" at the reverse proxy, load balancer or WAF, case-insensitively and including lists such as "gzip, br". On Envoy and Istio, disable request decompression for Brotli. Review outbound calls. List the features that fetch content from servers you do not control, and patch the services that host them first.

Take 15 minutes to discover our platform with our experts

Patrowl Intel platform screenshot